Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/116092
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences-
dc.contributorMental Health Research Centre-
dc.creatorChung, HKS-
dc.creatorXin, M-
dc.creatorLi, Q-
dc.creatorLin, J-
dc.creatorYang, X-
dc.creatorHo, PKC-
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-18T06:49:47Z-
dc.date.available2025-11-18T06:49:47Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/116092-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd.en_US
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2025. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Chung, H.Ks., Xin, M., Li, Q. et al. The validation, reliability, and measurement invariance of the cognitive fusion questionnaire in Chinese community-dwelling adults. BMC Psychol 13, 629 (2025) is available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03011-5.en_US
dc.subjectChineseen_US
dc.subjectCognitive fusionen_US
dc.subjectCommunity-dwelling adultsen_US
dc.subjectMeasurement invarianceen_US
dc.subjectPsychometric propertiesen_US
dc.titleThe validation, reliability, and measurement invariance of the cognitive fusion questionnaire in Chinese community-dwelling adultsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume13-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s40359-025-03011-5-
dcterms.abstractBackground: There was no study on the validation and measurement invariance test of the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ) among Chinese community-dwelling adults. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability, validity and measurement invariance of the 7-item CFQ for cognitive fusion among Chinese community-dwelling adults in Hong Kong.-
dcterms.abstractMethods: In total, 552 Chinese adults (18–64 years old; 51% males) in Hong Kong finished the online survey during March to April 2023. The questionnaire included the CFQ, the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (psychological flexibility), the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (psychological distress), the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (mental well-being), and the self-rated mental health. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and multi-group CFA were conducted.-
dcterms.abstractResults: The unidimensional structure of the scale was confirmed by CFA, with a satisfactory fit to the sample (χ2(14)= 15.935, p = 0.317, CFI = 0.998, RMSEA = 0.024, SRMR = 0.021). The standardized factor loadings ranged from 0.71 to 0.78. Full scalar invariance across educational level and psychological distress level and partial scalar invariance across gender and age groups were confirmed by multi-group CFA. The CFQ showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.90), and convergent validity with significant correlations with experiential avoidance (rs(430) = 0.69, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.74), psychological distress (rs(430) = 0.61, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.67), mental wellbeing (rs(430) = -0.29, 95% CI -0.38 to -0.20) and self-rated mental health (rs(430) = -0.24, 95% CI -0.33 to -0.15), with p-values all < 0.001.-
dcterms.abstractConclusions: This study is the first to examine the psychometric properties of the 7-item CFQ in Chinese community-dwelling adults in Hong Kong. The CFQ is a brief, reliable and valid measure for assessing CF among Chinese community-dwelling adults. Caution is warranted for direct comparison across samples with uneven age and gender distributions.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBMC psychology, 2025, v. 13, 629-
dcterms.isPartOfBMC psychology-
dcterms.issued2025-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105009532150-
dc.identifier.pmid40597266-
dc.identifier.eissn2050-7283-
dc.identifier.artn629-
dc.description.validate202511 bcch-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThis study was funded by the Direct Grant (Ref#2022.024) by the Chinese University of Hong Kong and the Start-up Fund of Strategic Hiring Scheme (Ref# P0042661) and Start-up Fund for New Recruits (Ref#P0052547) by the Hong Kong Polytechnic University.en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s40359-025-03011-5.pdf1.07 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.