Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/115861
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Designen_US
dc.creatorChellappa, Ven_US
dc.creatorLuximon, Yen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-10T06:20:52Z-
dc.date.available2025-11-10T06:20:52Z-
dc.identifier.issn1562-3599en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/115861-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.subjectComputer-aided technologiesen_US
dc.subjectConstruction industryen_US
dc.subjectErgonomicsen_US
dc.subjectMusculoskeletal disordersen_US
dc.titleComputer-aided technologies for posture-based ergonomic risk assessment in construction : a systematic reviewen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage1en_US
dc.identifier.epage16en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/15623599.2025.2520880en_US
dcterms.abstractThe limitations of traditional postural ergonomic risk assessment (ERA) methods prompted the construction research community to turn to computer-aided technologies (CATs) for assistance. However, a comprehensive review is lacking to systematically examine the application of CATs for ERA in this context. This study aimed to understand the CATs used for ERA and their implementation trends, evaluate their technological capabilities, and practical applications, identify critical gaps in current research, and provide actionable insights. The systematic literature review (SLR) followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRIaSMA) protocol to retrieve relevant documents from the Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) databases. Based on the researcher’s pre-established inclusion criteria, 85 papers were retrieved and subsequently analyzed through a content analysis approach. The findings revealed eight CATs adopted for ERA in construction wearable sensors, vision-based, machine learning/deep learning, exoskeletons, expert systems, virtual reality, computer-aided design, and digital twins. Further, the analysis uncovered various benefits and limitations of implementing each technology and identified critical gaps in the existing research. The findings emphasize the need for future research to address these gaps, explore broader applications, and integrate innovative solutions to enhance worker occupational health and well-being within the construction domain.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationInternational journal of construction management, Published online: 14 July 2025, Latest Articles, https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2025.2520880en_US
dcterms.isPartOfInternational journal of construction managementen_US
dcterms.issued2025-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105010696785-
dc.identifier.eissn2331-2327en_US
dc.description.validate202511 bcwcen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG000340/2025-08-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThis research was supported by a Distinguished Postdoctoral Fellowship from The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (Project ID: P0048660).en_US
dc.description.pubStatusEarly releaseen_US
dc.date.embargo2026-07-14en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2026-07-14
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.