Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/115849
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Nursingen_US
dc.contributorResearch Centre for Chinese Medicine Innovationen_US
dc.creatorWu, Yen_US
dc.creatorQin, Hen_US
dc.creatorWang, Sen_US
dc.creatorYang, Qen_US
dc.creatorZhang, Yen_US
dc.creatorWang, HHen_US
dc.creatorXie, YJen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-07T05:56:40Z-
dc.date.available2025-11-07T05:56:40Z-
dc.identifier.issn1047-2797en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/115849-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Inc.en_US
dc.subjectAge differencesen_US
dc.subjectCross-sectional studyen_US
dc.subjectEpidemiologyen_US
dc.subjectMachine learningen_US
dc.subjectMigraineen_US
dc.subjectPredictive modellingen_US
dc.subjectPredictorsen_US
dc.subjectWomen's healthen_US
dc.titlePredictors of migraine prevalence among different age groups in Hong Kong Chinese women : machine learning analyses on the MECH-HK cohorten_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage34en_US
dc.identifier.epage42en_US
dc.identifier.volume110en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.annepidem.2025.07.017en_US
dcterms.abstractPurpose: To identify age-specific predictors of migraine prevalence among Chinese women. Methods: In this cross-sectional analysis, 54 predictors were collected from the MECH-HK cohort. Migraine was assessed by the ICHD 3rd edition. Machine learning was employed to select a streamlined subset of predictors. Participants were categorised as young and middle age group (<60 years) and old age group (≥60 years) for analysis. Results: The mean age of participants was 54.3 years. Migraine prevalence was higher in women under 60 than in older women (10.7 % vs. 6.0 %, P < 0.001). Lasso selected seven (<60 years) and twelve (≥60 years) predictors, respectively. The top three predictors among women under 60 were fatigue, migraine family history, and PSQI, explaining 6.6 %, 5.0 %, and 4.9 % of variation, respectively. Their ORs (95 % CIs) were 1.61 (1.37–1.89), 3.93 (2.77–5.57), and 1.29 (1.12–1.48), respectively. For older women, the top three predictors were experience of hunger, smartphone usage time, and migraine family history, explaining 2.0 %, 1.8 %, and 1.6 % of variation, respectively, with ORs (95 % CIs) of 2.16 (1.21–3.84), 1.24 (1.03–1.48), and 2.26 (1.16–4.40), respectively. Conclusion: Migraine family history and experience of hunger were shared predictors for migraine prevalence in both ages. Other predictors differentially influence migraine prevalence across ages.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAnnals of epidemiology, Oct. 2025, v. 110, p. 34-42en_US
dcterms.isPartOfAnnals of epidemiologyen_US
dcterms.issued2025-10-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105012397105-
dc.identifier.pmid40681130-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-2585en_US
dc.description.validate202511 bchyen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG000332/2025-08-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextFunding text 1: This study was funded by the Early Career Scheme of the Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee of Hong Kong (grant number: 25101418), the General Research Fund, Research Grants Council of the University Grants Committee of Hong Kong (grant number: 15100822), and the One-line Budget from The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (University Grants Committee, project ID: P0051321). The funding organizations had no role in the study's design, data analysis, interpretation, or manuscript writing.; Funding text 2: This study was funded by the Early Career Scheme of the Research Grants Council , University Grants Committee of Hong Kong (grant number: 25101418 ), the General Research Fund, Research Grants Council of the University Grants Committee of Hong Kong (grant number: 15100822 ), and the One-line Budget from The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (University Grants Committee, project ID: P0051321 ). The funding organizations had no role in the study\u2019s design, data analysis, interpretation, or manuscript writing.en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2026-10-31en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2026-10-31
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.