Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/115845
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Language Science and Technologyen_US
dc.creatorZhu, Sen_US
dc.creatorLi, Jen_US
dc.creatorYao, Yen_US
dc.creatorGuan, Yen_US
dc.creatorZhu, Xen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-07T02:58:24Z-
dc.date.available2025-11-07T02:58:24Z-
dc.identifier.issn1096-7516en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/115845-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJAIen_US
dc.subjectGenai-assisted writing feedbacken_US
dc.subjectGenerative Aien_US
dc.subjectPre-service teachers' trainingen_US
dc.subjectWriting feedback levelsen_US
dc.subjectWriting feedback typesen_US
dc.titleWhat they provide and how : an intervention study on pre-service teachers' GenAI-assisted writing feedbacken_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume67en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.101040en_US
dcterms.abstractProviding effective writing feedback to students could promote students' writing development. However, offering high-quality feedback remains a significant challenge for pre-service teachers (PSTs). Recent advancements in GenAI technology may offer solutions to this issue. The study examines the influence of a short-term teaching intervention on the feedback levels and feedback types of PSTs' ChatGPT-assisted feedback on students' written compositions, utilizing an explanatory sequential mixed-method design with 30 PSTs. The quantitative results revealed significant improvements in both feedback levels (i.e., higher-level feedback issues including ideas and elaboration and style) and feedback types (e.g., explanations and general suggestions). Additionally, the findings highlighted specific strategies employed by PSTs when considering levels and types in combination. Subsequent interviews identified the underlying influential factors of these improvements, namely the improvements in ChatGPT usage skills (i.e., prompt engineering and source use) and a deeper understanding of the feedback process (i.e., introspection). By demonstrating how short-term teaching interventions can leverage PST's ability to use GenAI tools to provide writing feedback, this research advances the theoretical understanding of human-AI collaboration in the context of writing and provides pedagogical insights for teacher training programs.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationInternet and higher education, Oct. 2025, v. 67, 101040en_US
dcterms.isPartOfInternet and higher educationen_US
dcterms.issued2025-10-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105013849024-
dc.identifier.artn101040en_US
dc.description.validate202511 bchyen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG000328/2025-09-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2027-10-31en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2027-10-31
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.