Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/115842
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building Environment and Energy Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorChen, Sen_US
dc.creatorYou, Ren_US
dc.creatorChen, Qen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-05T03:41:31Z-
dc.date.available2025-11-05T03:41:31Z-
dc.identifier.issn2210-6707en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/115842-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectComputational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)en_US
dc.subjectInfection risken_US
dc.subjectInterpersonal distanceen_US
dc.subjectMetro carriageen_US
dc.subjectSARS-CoV-2 virusen_US
dc.subjectVirus-laden particlesen_US
dc.titleEstimating the real-life infection risk of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in a typical metro compartmenten_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume131en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scs.2025.106693en_US
dcterms.abstractThe metro has been an essential means of commuting for Hong Kong citizens, even during the pandemic. To evaluate the real-life infection risks of airborne SARS-CoV-2 in a typical half-metro carriage, field tests were first carried out to obtain thermo-fluid boundary conditions, air exchange rates, and passenger locations in metro compartments. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) models of half of a metro carriage integrating real-world passenger distribution were built for different crowdedness level with 37, 57, and 75 passengers to determine the infection risk for commuters during typical metro trips. A total of 2449 cases were evaluated, and the study found that the infection risk of SARS-CoV-2 in the benchmark case (one source passenger talking continuously for 26 min in a lightly crowded compartment) varied from 0 % to 7.1 % depending on passenger location, and the corresponding overall infection risk was 1.75 %. No risk existed during a short metro ride of 2 min, and the infection risk increased with the talking durations/coughing frequencies, co-travel durations, and crowdedness levels. The infection risk for seated passengers was higher than that for standing passengers due to the shorter interpersonal distance for the former. Over 80 % of infections occurred within 1.5 m of the source passenger, and 100 % occurred within 2.6 m in metro carriages with different crowdedness levels. A safe social distance of 2.6 m from a potential source passenger is recommended in metro carriages. This study's findings provide guidelines for safeguarding the health of metro commuters for seasonal illnesses and the future pandemics.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSustainable cities and society, 1 Sept 2025, v. 131, 106693en_US
dcterms.isPartOfSustainable cities and societyen_US
dcterms.issued2025-09-01-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105012354743-
dc.identifier.eissn2210-6715en_US
dc.identifier.artn106693en_US
dc.description.validate202511 bcjzen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG000327/2025-08-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe research work described in this paper was conducted in the JC STEM Lab of Healthy Built Environment funded by The Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust.en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2027-09-01en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2027-09-01
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.