Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/115746
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Nursingen_US
dc.creatorFung, HWen_US
dc.creatorChau, AKCen_US
dc.creatorRoss, CAen_US
dc.creatorŞar, Ven_US
dc.creatorDerin, Gen_US
dc.creatorAkiş, ADen_US
dc.creatorChiu, HTSen_US
dc.creatorZatopek, Aen_US
dc.creatorHo, GWKen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-27T06:37:09Z-
dc.date.available2025-10-27T06:37:09Z-
dc.identifier.issn1876-2018en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/115746-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectCross-cultural psychiatryen_US
dc.subjectDissociative Disordersen_US
dc.subjectDissociative identity disorder (DID)en_US
dc.subjectPartial DIDen_US
dc.subjectSelf-reporten_US
dc.titleMeasuring ICD-11 dissociative identity disorder : cross-cultural validation of the international dissociative identity disorder questionnaireen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume112en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ajp.2025.104685en_US
dcterms.abstractRecently, the ICD-11 has updated the diagnostic requirements for dissociative identity disorder (DID) and introduced partial DID as a new diagnosis. This study validated the first measure of DID and partial DID as defined in ICD-11. Two convenience samples of mental health service users (118 Chinese speakers and 115 English speakers) completed the International Dissociative Identity Disorder Questionnaire (IDIDQ), the Dissociative Experiences Scale-Taxon (DES-T), and the Multiscale Dissociation Inventory (MDI) in their respective language. The IDIDQ had good to excellent internal consistency (α =.861 to.892) and test-retest reliability (ICC =.682 to.854, p < .001) in both samples. The 3-factor structure of DID (i.e., amnesia, dissociative identities, and switching), as proposed in ICD-11, was supported by our cross-cultural data, with configural, metric and scalar invariance established across the Chinese- and English-speaking samples. The IDIDQ reliably detected probable ICD-11 DID and partial DID (κ =.517 to.781, p < .001) during a one-week test-retest period. The IDIDQ subscales were strongly correlated with the respective MDI subscales and the DES-T scores. The IDIDQ results had moderate to substantial agreement with the MDI Identity Dissociation subscale and the DES-T in both samples (κ =.514 to.741, p < .001). This study provides first evidence showing the ICD-11 DID and partial DID can be reliably and validly measured using the IDIDQ.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAsian journal of psychiatry, Oct. 2025, v. 112, 104685en_US
dcterms.isPartOfAsian journal of psychiatryen_US
dcterms.issued2025-10-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105015394949-
dc.identifier.pmid40934746-
dc.identifier.eissn1876-2026en_US
dc.identifier.artn104685en_US
dc.description.validate202510 bchyen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG000285/2025-10-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2026-10-31en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2026-10-31
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.