Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/115486
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciencesen_US
dc.creatorTsang, CSLen_US
dc.creatorOuyang, Hen_US
dc.creatorMiller, Ten_US
dc.creatorPang, MYCen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-02T00:56:02Z-
dc.date.available2025-10-02T00:56:02Z-
dc.identifier.issn1545-9683en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/115486-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.rightsThis is the accepted version of the publication Tsang CSL, Ouyang H, Miller T, Pang MYC. Effects of Cognitive Task Type and Complexity on Dual-Task Interference During Level-Ground Walking and Obstacle Negotiation in Individuals with Stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2025;39(8):624-638. Copyright © 2025 (The Author(s)). DOI: 10.1177/15459683251340930.en_US
dc.subjectCognitionen_US
dc.subjectMobility limitationen_US
dc.subjectMulti-tasking behavioren_US
dc.subjectStroke rehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectTask performance and analysisen_US
dc.subjectWalkingen_US
dc.titleEffects of cognitive task type and complexity on dual-task interference during level-ground walking and obstacle negotiation in individuals with strokeen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage624en_US
dc.identifier.epage638en_US
dc.identifier.volume39en_US
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/15459683251340930en_US
dcterms.abstractBackground: Compromised dual-task walking ability reduces functional independence in community-dwelling individuals after stroke. Objective. To examine the influence of mobility task and cognitive task type and complexity, and their interaction on dual-task level-ground walking and obstacle-crossing after stroke. Methods: Ninety-three individuals with chronic stroke (mean [SD] age = 62.4 [6.7] years, stroke duration = 67.7 [53.5] months) participated in this observational study with repeated measures. For each dual-task testing condition, a mobility task (level-ground walking or obstacle-crossing) was performed concurrently with 1 of 5 cognitive tasks (serial-subtractions, category naming, clock test, auditory discrimination, and shopping-list recall). Each cognitive task involved low and high complexity levels, yielding 20 dual-task conditions in total. Dual-task effect (DTE = [single-task − dual-task]×100/single-task) on walking distance (mobility-DTE) and number of correct responses (cognitive-DTE) were calculated for each dual-task condition. Results: Medium to large interaction effects were observed between cognitive task type and complexity on cognitive (F = 12.0-15.8, P <.001, ηp2 = 0.12-0.15) and mobility performance (F = 3.2-5.5, P <.05, ηp2 = 0.03-0.06) during dual-task level-ground walking and obstacle-crossing. Among the cognitive tasks, serial-subtraction had the greatest interference effect on both cognitive (Mean DTE = −9.2 to −21.5%) and mobility performance (Mean DTE = −18.7 to −19.1%). Overall, “mobility interference” (decrement in walking distance without a decrement in cognitive performance) was the most common dual-task effect pattern observed. Conclusion: The type and complexity level of the mobility and cognitive tasks interact to influence the degree and pattern of dual-task effects, with the serial-subtraction task inducing the greatest effect. Standardized assessments involving distinct cognitive domains are necessary for profiling dual-task interference during walking among individuals with chronic stroke.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationNeurorehabilitation and neural repair, Aug. 2025, v. 39, no. 8, p. 624-638en_US
dcterms.isPartOfNeurorehabilitation and neural repairen_US
dcterms.issued2025-08-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105008068575-
dc.identifier.eissn1552-6844en_US
dc.description.validate202510 bchyen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG000172/2025-07-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was supported by the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [grant number 151594/16M]. The first author was supported by a postgraduate studentship award provided by the Department of Rehabilitation Sciences at The Hong Kong Polytechnic University [grant number RUNV].en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Tsang_Effects_Cognitive_Task.pdfPre-Published version711.6 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.