Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/115465
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estateen_US
dc.creatorWu, Xen_US
dc.creatorShen, GQen_US
dc.creatorTeng, Yen_US
dc.creatorJiang, Ren_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-29T05:01:04Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-29T05:01:04Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/115465-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.subjectComparative analysisen_US
dc.subjectCradle to end-of-useen_US
dc.subjectEmbodied carbonen_US
dc.subjectHigh-rise concrete buildingen_US
dc.subjectProcess-based methoden_US
dc.subjectVolumetric modular constructionen_US
dc.titleComparative cradle to end-of-use embodied carbon analysis of high-rise concrete buildings using volumetric modular and panelized constructionen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume100en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jobe.2024.111736en_US
dcterms.abstractGlobal carbon neutrality targets necessitate significant emissions reductions across industries, with the construction industry playing a crucial role. Construction processes have evolved to address this challenge, from traditional to more efficient modes. Panelized construction (PC) enhances efficiency and resource utilization compared to traditional construction by prefabricating raw materials into standardized components in the factory and transporting them to the site for construction. Volumetric modular construction (VMC) further advances the on-site process introduced by PC, transforming it from traditional construction activities to primarily assembly-based procedures. However, comparative analyses of embodied carbon (EC) between VMC and PC remain limited. It is still to be clarified whether VMC can achieve carbon reductions compared to two-dimensional PC and at which stages, leading to the identification of possible low-carbon pathways. This study addresses this gap by systematically examining and comparing the EC and possible causes of high-rise concrete residential buildings constructed using VMC and PC from cradle to end-of-use, proposing low-carbon recommendations. First, a multi-level framework for measuring and comparing EC was developed to analyze the EC emissions associated with VMC and PC across various temporal and spatial dimensions. Second, the analytical results derived from the framework elucidated which stages of reductions were achieved and explored the causes. Third, the study employed the first high-rise modular residential concrete building with cast-in-situ shear walls in China as the case study. Results indicate that the typical floor in VMC exhibits average EC emissions of 750.2 kg CO2e/m2, compared to 765.51 kg CO2e/m2 for PC, reflecting a 2 % reduction in EC emissions. Despite EC emissions increasing during the transportation stage in VMC due to the larger size and weight of the modules, overall reductions are achieved by minimizing waste in other stages. These findings contribute valuable insights to EC from high-rise VMC and provide a replicable framework for systematic EC comparison across different stages. Results demonstrate that VMC with a higher degree of prefabrication results in lower EC, and transportation strategies significantly impact its effectiveness. The framework also facilitates the integration of VMC into carbon markets, supporting industry-wide carbon reduction initiatives.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of building engineering, 15 Apr. 2025, v. 100, 111736en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of building engineeringen_US
dcterms.issued2025-04-15-
dc.identifier.eissn2352-7102en_US
dc.identifier.artn111736en_US
dc.description.validate202509 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera4095-
dc.identifier.SubFormID52082-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe work presented in this paper was supported by the Young Scientists Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.: 72301232, 72204248), Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (No.: 2023A1515012558), General Research Fund of the Hong Kong Research Grants Council (No.: 15220923), Shenzhen Municipal Science and Technology Innovation Commission Key Basic Research Fund (No.: JCYJ20220818102211024), Hong Kong Polytechnic University Carbon Neutrality Fund (No. P0043733), and CSCI-2021-Z-10-07. Also acknowledged is support from China State Hailong Technology Company Limited for access to the case building for study.en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2027-04-15en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2027-04-15
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.