Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/115419
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of English and Communication-
dc.creatorWang, AW-
dc.creatorFriginal, E-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-25T01:41:43Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-25T01:41:43Z-
dc.identifier.issn2961-3094-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/115419-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherDe La Salle University Publishing Houseen_US
dc.rightsCopyright: © 2025 by the authors.en_US
dc.rightsThis article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Wang, Amber Wanwen and Friginal, Eric (2025) "From Tradition to Innovation? A Diachronic Corpus Analysis of Simplified Technical English in Aviation," Journal of English and Applied Linguistics: Vol. 4: Iss. 2, Article 1 is available at https://doi.org/10.59588/2961-3094.1168.en_US
dc.subjectCorpus linguisticsen_US
dc.subjectReading comprehensionen_US
dc.subjectSimplified Technical English (STE)en_US
dc.subjectTechnical writingen_US
dc.subjectText complexityen_US
dc.titleFrom tradition to innovation? A diachronic corpus analysis of simplified technical English in aviationen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume4-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.doi10.59588/2961-3094.1168-
dcterms.abstractReading comprehension and fluency are fundamental for successful text processing, particularly in high-stakes environments like aviation maintenance where unclear technical documentation can have fatal consequences. This risk is amplified by the significant proportion of non-native English speakers in the global aviation maintenance workforce. While Simplified Technical English (STE) was introduced in the mid-1980s as an international specification to address these challenges and has evolved through continuous user feedback, its effectiveness in reducing text complexity and improving comprehension remains underexplored. This research examines language changes in aviation maintenance documentation from pre-1990 to 2024, analyzing linguistic variations across two generations of technical manuals for a widely used narrow-body commercial aircraft from an 8.2-million-word corpus. Employing Biber's Multi-Dimensional Analysis (1988) alongside Coh-Metrix (Graesser et al., 2004), the study uncovers significant linguistic variations: later-generation texts demonstrate higher levels of interactive and accessible plain language style (Dimension 1), while higher Dimension 6 scores indicate enhanced real-time informational elaboration oriented towards immediate contextual demands. Follow-up experiments isolating eight distinctive linguistic features reveal that linguistic simplification can be a double-edged sword; while enhancing accessibility, it may inadvertently diminish essential textual attributes that facilitate comprehension. This research offers valuable insights for future STE development, emphasizing the need to balance immediate comprehensibility and operational safety with the preservation of textual cohesion and appropriate linguistic complexity.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of English and applied linguistics, Dec. 2025, v. 4, no. 2, 1-
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of English and applied linguistics-
dcterms.issued2025-12-
dc.identifier.artn1-
dc.description.validate202509 bcch-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera4091en_US
dc.identifier.SubFormID52075en_US
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1_Amber_Friginal 9-29-25 (revised).pdf860.92 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.