Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/115409
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor | School of Design | - |
dc.creator | Ho, JCF | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-23T03:16:52Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-09-23T03:16:52Z | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/115409 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Design Research Society | en_US |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) | en_US |
dc.rights | The following publicaton C. F. Ho, J. (2024) Communicating the use of generative AI to design students: Fostering ethics rather than teaching it, in Gray, C., Ciliotta Chehade, E., Hekkert, P., Forlano, L., Ciuccarelli, P., Lloyd, P. (eds.), DRS2024: Boston, 23–28 June, Boston, USA is available at https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2024.731. | en_US |
dc.subject | Design education | en_US |
dc.subject | Design ethics | en_US |
dc.subject | Ethics education | en_US |
dc.subject | Generative AI | en_US |
dc.title | Communicating the use of generative AI to design students : fostering ethics rather than teaching it | en_US |
dc.type | Conference Paper | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.21606/drs.2024.731 | - |
dcterms.abstract | This paper presents a means of communicating to design students the appropriate use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in their studies. It underscores the need to consider broader aspects such as individual student identity and ethical considerations, given the emerging popularity of GenAI. The paper explores the necessity for students to acknowledge their use of GenAI. It draws parallels between GenAI and traditional design resources, likening the use of GenAI to leveraging other designers' work and assistance received during projects. This analogy is employed as a strategy to link the decision to disclose the use of GenAI with the students' designer identity. The delineation between contexts in which students are permitted to use GenAI and those in which they are encouraged to do so is tied to their intended learning outcomes. Several case studies, both hypothetical and real, are discussed and analyzed to support the points raised in this paper. | - |
dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | In CM Gray, EC Chehade, P Hekkert, L Forlano, P Ciuccarelli, P Lloyd (Eds.), Proceedings of DRS2024 Boston: Resistance, Recovery, Reflection, Reimagination: Design Research Society International Conference Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 23–28 June 2024. London, United Kingdom: Design Research Society, 2024. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2024.731 | - |
dcterms.issued | 2024 | - |
dc.description.validate | 202509 bcch | - |
dc.description.oa | Version of Record | en_US |
dc.identifier.FolderNumber | a4080 | en_US |
dc.identifier.SubFormID | 52038 | en_US |
dc.description.fundingSource | Others | en_US |
dc.description.fundingText | This paper was supported by the Hong Kong Polytechnic University (Project No. P0041451). | en_US |
dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
dc.description.oaCategory | CC | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Conference Paper |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ho_Communicating_Use_Generative.pdf | 790.69 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.