Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/115409
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Design-
dc.creatorHo, JCF-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-23T03:16:52Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-23T03:16:52Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/115409-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherDesign Research Societyen_US
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)en_US
dc.rightsThe following publicaton C. F. Ho, J. (2024) Communicating the use of generative AI to design students: Fostering ethics rather than teaching it, in Gray, C., Ciliotta Chehade, E., Hekkert, P., Forlano, L., Ciuccarelli, P., Lloyd, P. (eds.), DRS2024: Boston, 23–28 June, Boston, USA is available at https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2024.731.en_US
dc.subjectDesign educationen_US
dc.subjectDesign ethicsen_US
dc.subjectEthics educationen_US
dc.subjectGenerative AIen_US
dc.titleCommunicating the use of generative AI to design students : fostering ethics rather than teaching iten_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.21606/drs.2024.731-
dcterms.abstractThis paper presents a means of communicating to design students the appropriate use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in their studies. It underscores the need to consider broader aspects such as individual student identity and ethical considerations, given the emerging popularity of GenAI. The paper explores the necessity for students to acknowledge their use of GenAI. It draws parallels between GenAI and traditional design resources, likening the use of GenAI to leveraging other designers' work and assistance received during projects. This analogy is employed as a strategy to link the decision to disclose the use of GenAI with the students' designer identity. The delineation between contexts in which students are permitted to use GenAI and those in which they are encouraged to do so is tied to their intended learning outcomes. Several case studies, both hypothetical and real, are discussed and analyzed to support the points raised in this paper.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationIn CM Gray, EC Chehade, P Hekkert, L Forlano, P Ciuccarelli, P Lloyd (Eds.), Proceedings of DRS2024 Boston: Resistance, Recovery, Reflection, Reimagination: Design Research Society International Conference Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 23–28 June 2024. London, United Kingdom: Design Research Society, 2024. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2024.731-
dcterms.issued2024-
dc.description.validate202509 bcch-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera4080en_US
dc.identifier.SubFormID52038en_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThis paper was supported by the Hong Kong Polytechnic University (Project No. P0041451).en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Conference Paper
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ho_Communicating_Use_Generative.pdf790.69 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.