Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/115121
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Logistics and Maritime Studies-
dc.creatorHuai, Y-
dc.creatorLee, E-
dc.creatorLo, HK-
dc.creatorZhang, A-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-09T07:41:35Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-09T07:41:35Z-
dc.identifier.issn0191-2615-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/115121-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.subjectAirport chargeen_US
dc.subjectNon-aeronautical businessen_US
dc.subjectSuggested arrival timeen_US
dc.subjectTerminal capacity investmenten_US
dc.titleAirport charge, terminal capacity, and suggested airport arrival time : considering non-aeronautical businessen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume196-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.trb.2025.103222-
dcterms.abstractThis study investigates the optimal decisions of airports regarding charges, capacity, and passengers’ suggested arrival time at the airport (before flight departures) under different objectives (maximizing airport profit or social welfare). Our model incorporates an airport, airlines with market power, and passengers, and examines the impact on concession revenue of dwell time in (terminal) retail zones and queuing time in check-in zones. We find that whether a profit-maximizing airport charges or subsidizes airlines for using its aeronautical service depends critically on whether the trip demand is elastic with respect to airport charge and whether trip demand increases the concession surplus. In particular, when this is elastic and the trip demand also raises concession revenue, the airport will subsidize airlines. For welfare-maximizing airports, when trip demand decreases the concession surplus (due to shopping time shrinkage), airports would set the charge that the ticket price paid by passengers is higher than the social marginal cost incurred. Further, the airport’s decisions regarding terminal capacity are influenced by the trade-off between the revenue gained from increased traffic and the revenue lost from the reduced dwell time. By comparison with a welfare-maximizing airport, a profit-maximizing airport tends to invest more in terminal capacity under lower traffic, but less under higher traffic: basically, the effect of expanding terminal capacity on increasing shopping time (dwell time in the retail zone) is more pronounced for lower traffic, and the effect diminishes for higher traffic. The study also shows that a profit-maximizing airport would suggest travelers arrive at the airport earlier than a welfare-maximizing airport, so as to increase the non-aeronautical revenue.-
dcterms.accessRightsembaroged accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTransportation research. Part B, Methodological, June 2025, v. 196, 103222-
dcterms.isPartOfTransportation research. Part B, Methodological-
dcterms.issued2025-06-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105003399095-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-2367-
dc.identifier.artn103222-
dc.description.validate202509 bcch-
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera4005en_US
dc.identifier.SubFormID51908en_US
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe authors are grateful for the three anonymous referees and Associate Editor Prof. Robin Lindsey for their constructive comments and suggestions that led to a significant improvement of the paper. We greatly appreciate the helpful comments and discussions with Jan Brueckner, Achim Czerny, Xiaowen Fu, Zhi-Chun Li, (Sarah) Yulai Wan, Changmin Jiang, Hangjun Yang, Kun Wang, Wenyi Xia, Chunan Wang, Wei Liu and the seminar participants of 2023 International Aviation Technology and Business Conference (Hong Kong), 1st ATRS World Conference China Chapter (Beijing), 2024 Conference of International Transportation Economics Association ITEA (Leeds), the 27th ATRS World Conference (Lisbon) and 28th international conference of Hong Kong Society for Transportation Studies (HKSTS). We gratefully acknowledge the Airport Authority of Hong Kong for their data and discussion. We thank the financial support from Research Grants Council of Hong Kong SAR Government (No. 16207920, No. 16212222), Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada (No. 410-2011-0569, No. 435-2019-0525), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71890974, No. 71890970).en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2027-06-30en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embaroged access
Embargo End Date 2027-06-30
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.