Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/114824
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of English and Communication-
dc.creatorRahman, MM-
dc.creatorHu, G-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-01T01:52:38Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-01T01:52:38Z-
dc.identifier.issn0266-0784-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/114824-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_US
dc.rights© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Rahman, M. M., & Hu, G. (2025). EMI policy and practice divides in China, Japan, Malaysia and Nepal: Policymakers’ neoliberal ideologies and multilingual classroom realities in higher education. English Today, 1–7 is available at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078425000136.en_US
dc.subjectEnglish-medium instructionen_US
dc.subjectLanguage policyen_US
dc.subjectLanguage practiceen_US
dc.subjectMultilingual educationen_US
dc.subjectNeoliberal ideologiesen_US
dc.subjectTranslanguagingen_US
dc.titleEMI policy and practice divides in China, Japan, Malaysia and Nepalen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0266078425000136-
dcterms.abstractOver the past two decades, English has become a key medium of instruction in higher education in non-native English contexts, especially Asian countries. Extant research highlights the rapid expansion of English-medium instruction (EMI) and challenges in policy implementation, revealing tensions between different language policy levels (i.e., macro, meso and micro). Thus, a multilevel analysis is needed to understand these tensions. This review examines factors influencing EMI adoption in China, Japan, Malaysia, and Nepal, focusing on policy implementation by educators and students. Findings show that EMI adoption is driven by English's role as a global lingua franca and the permeation of neoliberal ideologies at the macro policymaking level. Such a macro-level endorsement of monolingual EMI has resulted in micro-level inequalities for students, with resistance manifested through multilingual practices, such as translanguaging, in the classroom. The discrepancies between language policies and practices highlight the necessity of reassessing the adequacy of monolingual EMI policies and the importance of adopting a multilingual policy framework. The article concludes with a critical discussion of the trends observed in these contexts and recommends several policy directions for the future.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationEnglish today, Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 June 2025, FirstView, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078425000136-
dcterms.isPartOfEnglish today-
dcterms.issued2025-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105008029279-
dc.identifier.eissn1474-0567-
dc.description.validate202509 bcch-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_TAen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusEarly releaseen_US
dc.description.TACUP (2025)en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryTAen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Rahman_EMI_Policy_Practice.pdf208.38 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.