Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/114812
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building Environment and Energy Engineering-
dc.contributorInternational Centre of Urban Energy Nexus-
dc.creatorXu, X-
dc.creatorCao, Q-
dc.creatorDeng, R-
dc.creatorGuo, Z-
dc.creatorChen, Y-
dc.creatorYan, J-
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-28T02:34:04Z-
dc.date.available2025-08-28T02:34:04Z-
dc.identifier.issn0960-1481-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/114812-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon Pressen_US
dc.subjectBenchmarken_US
dc.subjectCross-dataseten_US
dc.subjectNeural networken_US
dc.subjectRenewable energyen_US
dc.subjectWind power forecastingen_US
dc.titleA cross-dataset benchmark for neural network-based wind power forecastingen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume254-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.renene.2025.123463-
dcterms.abstractWind power generation is a critical and promising renewable energy source, and accurately forecasting its output can optimize energy management and yield substantial economic benefits. Despite the fact that a considerable number of the recent Wind Power Forecasting (WPF) studies employs neural network-based deep learning techniques, these studies are often conducted independently. There is an urgent need for a comprehensive benchmark to validate the effectiveness and robustness of neural networks in this domain and provide more valuable guidance for engineering practice. In this study, we first methodically delineate the task objectives of neural networks in WPF. Subsequently, we categorize neural network structures and task paradigms into autoregressive/non-autoregressive networks and deterministic/probabilistic predictions. Building on this, we establish a unified cross-dataset benchmark for neural networks in the WPF domain, which incorporates eight global wind power operation datasets at both turbine and farm scales. Finally, we conduct a series of neural network evaluation experiments based on this benchmark. The results indicate that neural networks excel in longer forecasting horizons, while autoregressive models show greater robustness in short-term forecasting, with non-autoregressive models progressively mitigate disparities in long-term forecasting.-
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationRenewable energy, 1 Dec. 2025, v. 254, 123463-
dcterms.isPartOfRenewable energy-
dcterms.issued2025-12-01-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105008188153-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-0682-
dc.identifier.artn123463-
dc.description.validate202508 bcch-
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG000102/2025-07en_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThis work funded by National Key Research and Development Program of China (2024YFF1500600) and Ningbo Natural Science Foundation Key Project (2023J027), as well as supported by the High Performance Computing Centers at Eastern Institute of Technology, Ningbo, and Ningbo Institute of Digital Twin.en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2027-12-01en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2027-12-01
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.