Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/114808
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorZhang, Xen_US
dc.creatorSong, Yen_US
dc.creatorYang, Xen_US
dc.creatorPham, TMen_US
dc.creatorBi, Ken_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-28T01:23:18Z-
dc.date.available2025-08-28T01:23:18Z-
dc.identifier.issn0141-0296en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/114808-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.subjectComparative studyen_US
dc.subjectConcrete-filled double-steel tubeen_US
dc.subjectCorrugated steel tubeen_US
dc.subjectLateral impact behavioren_US
dc.subjectNumerical investigationen_US
dc.titleLateral impact behaviors of concrete-filled double-steel tube with corrugated steel tube member(s)en_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume341en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120806en_US
dcterms.abstractConcrete-corrugated steel tube (CST) composites have been widely adopted in engineering practices due to their superior ductility and energy dissipation capabilities. Given the potential exposure of these structural members to extreme loads such as impact loads during their service life, understanding their impact behaviors is essential. This paper presents experimental and numerical investigations on the lateral impact behaviors of concrete-filled double-steel tube (CFDST) with CST member(s). For comparison, six specimens were prepared and tested, including one normal steel tube, one CST, one traditional CFDST, and three CFDSTs with one or two CSTs. The lateral impact behaviors in terms of failure modes, displacement responses, impact forces, energy absorption and strains were studied and compared. It was found that CFDST with an outer CST had a higher recovery rate, a longer plateau phase of impact force, and exhibited more ductile behavior under impact compared to other specimens. Finite element models were also developed and validated by the test results. Based on the validated numerical models, the deformation mechanism of CST, axial stress, interaction between the steel tube and concrete, sectional bending moment, and energy absorption capacity were further examined.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationEngineering structures, 15 Oct. 2025, v. 341, 120806en_US
dcterms.isPartOfEngineering structuresen_US
dcterms.issued2025-10-15-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105008872657-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-7323en_US
dc.identifier.artn120806en_US
dc.description.validate202508 bchyen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG000105/2025-07-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2027-10-15en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2027-10-15
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.