Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/114584
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Management and Marketingen_US
dc.creatorZhang, Xen_US
dc.creatorFang, Yen_US
dc.creatorZhou, Jen_US
dc.creatorLim, KHen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-12T08:15:34Z-
dc.date.available2025-08-12T08:15:34Z-
dc.identifier.issn0276-7783en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/114584-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMIS Research Centeren_US
dc.subjectCollaboration technologyen_US
dc.subjectCreative synthesis process facilitationen_US
dc.subjectIT project teamsen_US
dc.subjectTeam creativityen_US
dc.titleHow collaboration technology use affects IT project team creativity : integrating team knowledge and creative synthesis perspectivesen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage611en_US
dc.identifier.epage642en_US
dc.identifier.volume49en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.25300/MISQ/2023/16651en_US
dcterms.abstractContemporary IT project teams engage in creative problem solving to address increasingly complex business problems, highlighting the need to promote IT project team creativity. Collaboration technologies are widely used in IT project teams, but little is known about what collaboration technology features can be used to improve IT project team creativity and what the underlying influencing mechanisms are. To address this important gap, the current study builds on the extended team knowledge framework to identify collaboration technology features and decodes their influencing mechanisms on IT project team creativity by drawing on the novel creative synthesis theory originating in the management literature to the IT project team context. We identify three sets of collaboration technology support features—awareness knowledge supports, long-term knowledge supports, and transitional knowledge supports—and posit that their use can improve IT project team creativity by facilitating the creative synthesis process, which includes the three subconstructs of collective attention, similarity building, and enacting ideas. The research model is supported in general by empirical data collected through a multisourced survey of over 500 team members and their leaders from 62 IT project teams. We conclude with a discussion of theoretical and practical implications.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMIS quarterly, June 2025, v. 49, no. 2, p. 611-642en_US
dcterms.isPartOfMIS quarterlyen_US
dcterms.issued2025-06-
dc.identifier.eissn2162-9730en_US
dc.description.validate202508 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera3503b-
dc.identifier.SubFormID50269-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextNational Natural Science Foundation of Chinaen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2030-06-30en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryVoR alloweden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2030-06-30
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.