Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/114580
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building Environment and Energy Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorZhang, Yen_US
dc.creatorDing, Yen_US
dc.creatorZhang, Xen_US
dc.creatorHuang, Xen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-12T01:56:52Z-
dc.date.available2025-08-12T01:56:52Z-
dc.identifier.issn0886-7798en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/114580-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.subjectAvailable safe egress timeen_US
dc.subjectFire safetyen_US
dc.subjectSafety criteriaen_US
dc.subjectTunnel fireen_US
dc.subjectVisibilityen_US
dc.titleMulti-scale spatial-temporal principles of global evacuation safety based on Pareto Frontiers : a demonstration in tunnelen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume166en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tust.2025.106950en_US
dcterms.abstractTraditional design principle of fire safety evaluates an available safe egress time (ASET) in a whole, which ignoring spatial–temporal evolution of fires in complex structures such as high-rise buildings, complex tunnels and large underground spaces. This study introduces multi-scale spatial–temporal principles of evacuation safety to consider both the dynamic fire development and multi-scale flow of evacuees from individual zones to entire communities. We propose the use of local (L-ASET) and global (G-ASET) evacuation to capture the dynamic interactions of fire, building layout, and occupant behavior. A novel framework leveraging Pareto Frontiers is developed to optimize evacuation strategies by balancing conflicting objectives such as minimizing evacuation time, reducing congestion, and maximizing safety. The approach is demonstrated through a case study of tunnel fires, revealing significant variations in L-ASET and G-ASET across zones based on visibility, temperature, and Fractional Effective Dose (FED) criteria. 10 fire scenarios are studied, and in high HRR, Zone 1 becomes untenable within 20–30 s, while further zones remain tenable for up to 700 s based on visibility and temperature thresholds. FED-based assessment further confirms differentiated safety levels across regions. These findings demonstrate the limitations of uniform evacuation assumptions and highlight the need for spatially adaptive, phase-based evacuation strategies. It also provides insights into dynamic resource allocation for firefighting operations and enhancing fire safety design and intelligent evacuation systems with adaptive responses to complex fire scenarios for large infrastructures and underground spaces.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTunnelling and underground space technology, Dec. 2025, v. 166, 106950en_US
dcterms.isPartOfTunnelling and underground space technologyen_US
dcterms.issued2025-12-
dc.identifier.eissn1878-4364en_US
dc.identifier.artn106950en_US
dc.description.validate202508 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera3977-
dc.identifier.SubFormID51860-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThis work is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52204232), Hong Kong Research Grants Council Theme-based Research Scheme (T22-505/19-N), and the MTR Research Fund (PTU- 23005).en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2027-12-31en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2027-12-31
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.