Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/114344
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Chinese and Bilingual Studies-
dc.creatorYao, Y-
dc.creatorZhu, X-
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-25T03:28:22Z-
dc.date.available2025-07-25T03:28:22Z-
dc.identifier.issn0922-4777-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/114344-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Dordrechten_US
dc.rights© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022en_US
dc.rightsThis version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use (https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/policies/accepted-manuscript-terms), but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10339-6.en_US
dc.subjectEnglish writing competenceen_US
dc.subjectFeedback-seeking behavioren_US
dc.subjectGoal orientationsen_US
dc.subjectLanguage mindsetsen_US
dc.titleModeling Chinese high school EFL writers’ language mindsets, goal orientations, and feedback-seeking behavior : the interaction effect between language mindsets and writing competenceen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage539-
dc.identifier.epage561-
dc.identifier.volume37-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11145-022-10339-6-
dcterms.abstractThe feedback-seeking behavior (FSB) framework offers a novel perspective for analyzing second language (L2) learners’ proactive agency in processing teacher feedback. While research has identified associations among language mindsets, goal orientations, and FSB in L2 speaking classes, this line of inquiry should be extended to L2 writing education where students’ responses to teacher feedback have received increasing attention. Particularly, the role of writing competence in this process needs to be examined. This study was conducted at a prestigious public high school in southwest mainland China, with a sample of 462 12th grade students. Our path model provided the following three major findings. First, growth mindset students may pursue learning or performance-approach goals. Regardless of writing competence, they would both inquire and monitor teacher feedback. Second, learning oriented growth mindset students preferred feedback monitoring, whereas performance-approach oriented growth mindset students preferred feedback inquiry. Third, only highly proficient fixed mindset students pursued performance-approach goals, which could lead to both feedback monitoring and inquiry, with a slight inclination toward the latter; meanwhile, less proficient fixed mindset students were unlikely to do so. Finally, we make pedagogical suggestions based on these findings.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationReading and writing, Mar. 2024, v. 37, no. 3, p. 539-561-
dcterms.isPartOfReading and writing-
dcterms.issued2024-03-
dc.identifier.eissn1573-0905-
dc.description.validate202507 bcch-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera3943den_US
dc.identifier.SubFormID51787en_US
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Yao_Modeling_Chinese_High.pdfPre-Published version907.03 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.