Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/114332
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Chinese and Bilingual Studies-
dc.creatorYao, Y-
dc.creatorZhu, X-
dc.creatorXiao, L-
dc.creatorLu, Q-
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-24T02:01:51Z-
dc.date.available2025-07-24T02:01:51Z-
dc.identifier.issn1060-3743-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/114332-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.subjectActivity theoryen_US
dc.subjectArtificial intelligence-guided chatboten_US
dc.subjectFeedbacken_US
dc.subjectSecond language writingen_US
dc.titleSecondary school English teachers’ application of artificial intelligence-guided chatbot in the provision of feedback on student writing : an activity theory perspectiveen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume67-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101179-
dcterms.abstractThe integration of artificial intelligence (AI)-guided chatbots as supplementary tools for L2 writing instruction has gained attention, yet uncertainties remain about how teachers incorporate such tools into their feedback practices and what factors influence this process. To address these gaps, this study adopted Activity Theory (AT) as the framework and involved 13 secondary school English teachers from two public secondary schools in southern China. The teachers used Kimi, an AI-guided chatbot, to support their feedback provision on student writing. The results revealed differences in the features of Kimi and teacher feedback (i.e., amount, length, foci, and types), as well as a complementary pattern between Kimi’s feedback and teachers’ self-initiated feedback. Additionally, the study identified the key components of the activity system within the context of AI-supported teacher feedback, including the subject, objectives, mediating artefacts, community, rules, and division of labor. This research provides empirical evidence regarding the facilitative role of AI-guided chatbots in supporting the provision of teacher feedback. The findings underscore the potential synergy between AI and teacher feedback, contributing to the enhancement of L2 writing instruction in secondary education.-
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of second language writing, Mar. 2025, v. 67, 101179-
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of second language writing-
dcterms.issued2025-03-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85216352316-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-1422-
dc.identifier.artn101179-
dc.description.validate202507 bcch-
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera3943ben_US
dc.identifier.SubFormID51764en_US
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2027-03-31en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2027-03-31
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.