Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/114298
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building Environment and Energy Engineering-
dc.creatorLu, M-
dc.creatorLai, JHK-
dc.creatorNg, RTH-
dc.creatorChiu, BWY-
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-23T00:46:43Z-
dc.date.available2025-07-23T00:46:43Z-
dc.identifier.issn1364-0321-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/114298-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.subjectBuilding energyen_US
dc.subjectCommissioningen_US
dc.subjectRetro-commissioningen_US
dc.subjectRetrofiten_US
dc.subjectReviewen_US
dc.titleReview on building retro-commissioning : a systematic-cascade literature analysis with expert validationen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume224-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rser.2025.116116-
dcterms.abstractTo optimize the energy performance of buildings, governments worldwide have introduced retro-commissioning (RCx), a systematic investigation of opportunities to improve the performance of existing buildings. However, RCx studies and applications are not as prevalent as those in the other building energy related domains. The past and recent states of RCx research have not been thoroughly investigated, and future research directions remain unclear. Therefore, a review is conducted to address these gaps using a systematic-cascade approach that includes: retrieval of RCx publications from the ScienceDirect and Scopus databases; bibliometric analysis of the publications using the VOSviewer software; in-depth qualitative analysis of key RCx publications and real case studies; and expert validation of the analysed findings. Key results include the identification of the regions of the past RCx studies, types of buildings and building systems investigated, data types, and data collection and analysis methods used in the studies. Distinct from the continual growth of research in the building energy domain, there was no discernible trend of RCx research. Among the past studies utilizing empirical data, universities and schools are mainly selected for testing RCx scenarios or hypotheses. Barriers and enablers for RCx implementation were found to fall into six categories: knowledge, manpower, finance, motivation, time, and data/information. Nine research gaps and corresponding future research directions were also identified. In addition to contributing to the existing body of RCx knowledge, the results of this study serve as a reference for RCx stakeholders and offer guidance for researchers to pursue further RCx studies.-
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationRenewable and sustainable energy reviews, Dec. 2025, v. 224, 116116-
dcterms.isPartOfRenewable and sustainable energy reviews-
dcterms.issued2025-12-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-0690-
dc.identifier.artn116116-
dc.description.validate202507 bcch-
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera3949-n01en_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe BEEE Research Fund (No. WZ3N) of The Hong Kong Polytechnic Universityen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2027-12-31en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2027-12-31
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.