Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/114265
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Hotel and Tourism Managementen_US
dc.creatorKong, TTHen_US
dc.creatorZou, Ren_US
dc.creatorXiao, Hen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-22T00:44:17Z-
dc.date.available2025-07-22T00:44:17Z-
dc.identifier.issn2211-9736en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/114265-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectCommunist heritage tourismen_US
dc.subjectCritical heritage studiesen_US
dc.subjectFramework-based systematic reviewen_US
dc.subjectRed tourismen_US
dc.titleTwenty years of red tourism research : a systematic literature review using the theories-contexts-characteristics-methods frameworken_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume58en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tmp.2025.101390en_US
dcterms.abstractPrevious red tourism reviews fall short of evaluating the theoretical foundations, contexts, characteristics and methods of existing literature. Through employing the Theories-Contexts-Characteristics-Methods framework, this paper is the first systematic review that synthesized 279 CSSCI Chinese-written and 30 English-written empirical research articles. It provides a snapshot of the state-of-the-art of red tourism scholarship to highlight extant knowledge gaps. Results show that research questions on red tourism exhibit a dominant managerial focus over the past 20 years. Most of the studies failed to address core attributes that make red heritage distinctive, including identity, emotions, memories, sense of place and power dynamics. This review also shows that the theoretical foundation of red tourism research is weak and fragmented. Most deployed theories are human-centric, which marginalizes red heritage and its endogenous attributes. Furthermore, current red tourism literature principally examines general domestic tourists and tangible heritage sites. Residents who are carriers of red memories and cultural practices, inbound tourists, adolescents and intangible red cultural heritage and traditions were overlooked. Drawing from critical heritage studies, this review contributes to red tourism and heritage tourism studies by suggesting new theoretical lenses (e.g., storytelling and post-anthropocentrism). Novel research questions that go beyond the current overreliance on specific research contexts are provided, complemented with a list of possible new methods.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTourism management perspectives, Sept. 2025, v. 58, 101390en_US
dcterms.isPartOfTourism management perspectivesen_US
dcterms.issued2025-09-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105007770393-
dc.identifier.eissn2211-9744en_US
dc.identifier.artn101390en_US
dc.description.validate202507 bcwhen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.SubFormIDG000016/2025-07-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThis work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42271256).en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2027-09-30en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2027-09-30
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.