Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/114230
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Nursing-
dc.creatorLi, CM-
dc.creatorHo, GWK-
dc.creatorLam, SKK-
dc.creatorFung, HW-
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-18T07:19:05Z-
dc.date.available2025-07-18T07:19:05Z-
dc.identifier.issn1876-2018-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/114230-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.subjectCross-cultural psychiatryen_US
dc.subjectPost-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)en_US
dc.subjectTraumaen_US
dc.titleLongitudinal psychometric validation and measurement invariance of the PTSD checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5)en_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume110-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ajp.2025.104599-
dcterms.abstractDespite the adoption of the four-factor model of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in the DSM-5, very few studies have provided longitudinal examinations of the temporal stability of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL- 5), particularly in East Asian contexts. In addition, its factorial structure and validity have been a subject of considerable debate, with accumulating evidence suggesting that alternative models may better capture the heterogeneity of PTSD symptoms. To address these gaps, the present study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Traditional Chinese version of the PCL-5 (TC-PCL-5) across three timepoints (N = 412 at Time 1, 232 at Time 2, and 132 at Time 3) in a community sample of Hong Kong adults, testing both the four- and six-factor structures of the PCL-5. Internal consistency of the scale remained stable across all three waves of the study (T1 : ω = 0.97; T2 : ω = 0.98; T3 : ω = 0.98). Intraclass correlation analyses revealed good test–retest reliability. Confirmatory factor analyses supported both factorial structures at each timepoint. Results demonstrated conf igural, metric, and scalar invariance across all three waves and indicated that the underlying factor structure, item loadings, and intercepts remained stable over time, with the six-factor structure showing a slightly better fit.-
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAsian journal of psychiatry, Aug. 2025, v. 110, 104599-
dcterms.isPartOfAsian journal of psychiatry-
dcterms.issued2025-08-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105009482877-
dc.identifier.eissn1876-2026-
dc.identifier.artn104599-
dc.description.validate202507 bcch-
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera3905en_US
dc.identifier.SubFormID51611en_US
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2026-08-31en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2026-08-31
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.