Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/114199
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Optometryen_US
dc.creatorLau, WYen_US
dc.creatorLian, Jen_US
dc.creatorYap, Men_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-15T08:44:18Z-
dc.date.available2025-07-15T08:44:18Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/114199-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_US
dc.rightsCopyright: © 2025 Lau et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Lau WY, Lian J, Yap M (2025) The effectiveness of interventions used to improve general health check uptake by the older adult population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS Glob Public Health 5(3): e0004362 is available at https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004362.en_US
dc.titleThe effectiveness of interventions used to improve general health check uptake by the older adult population : a systematic review and meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume5en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pgph.0004362en_US
dcterms.abstractUndergoing general health check enable early detection of common diseases and giving individuals a sense of control over their wellbeing. However, the general health check uptakes are typically unsatisfactory. Various interventions have been introduced to improve general health check uptakes. This review aims to answer how well these interventions work. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in four electronic databases in August 2020 and updated between 2021 and 2024. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that met the inclusion criteria were selected. Meta-analysis was performed on qualified RCTs to estimate the overall effectiveness of the interventions. The components of intervention were characterised using the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy. A total of 3360 records were screened. Eight RCTs were finally included. Among these RCTs, nine types of interventions were identified with all implemented in the invitation stage, including enhanced invitation letters, telephone invitations, question-behaviour-effect (QBE) questionnaires, financial incentives, leaflets, pre-notification short message service (SMS), SMS reminders, reminder letters and point-of-care automated prompts to clinical staff. All these interventions showed a significant improvement in the general health check uptakes than the control groups, except leaflets and QBE questionnaires. A total of fifteen behaviour change techniques were used in these interventions. A meta-analysis showed the pooled effect of these interventions was significantly associated with the improvement in the general health check uptakes than the control (OR =1.30, 95% CI =1.15 – 1.46). However, the high heterogeneity observed (84%) could reduce the reliability of the pooled summary effect. This review found that interventions primarily implemented during the invitation process are effective in improving the general health check uptake rates. Future research should aim to extend these interventions beyond the invitation stage to address internal and external barriers that deter older adults from seeking general health checks. The systematic review protocol is registered on PROSPERO (ref: CRD42021221041).en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPLoS global public health, 2025, v. 5, no. 3, e0004362en_US
dcterms.isPartOfPLoS global public healthen_US
dcterms.issued2025-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105001727615-
dc.identifier.eissn2767-3375en_US
dc.identifier.artne0004362en_US
dc.description.validate202507 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera3892-
dc.identifier.SubFormID51572-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
journal.pgph.0004362.pdf1.46 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.