Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/114176
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building Environment and Energy Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorCui, Den_US
dc.creatorLiang, Gen_US
dc.creatorTao, Ren_US
dc.creatorHang, Jen_US
dc.creatorChen, Gen_US
dc.creatorMak, CMen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-15T08:43:59Z-
dc.date.available2025-07-15T08:43:59Z-
dc.identifier.issn1996-3599en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/114176-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTsinghua University Pressen_US
dc.subjectAir change per hour (ACH)en_US
dc.subjectEnvelope featuresen_US
dc.subjectMulti-story buildingen_US
dc.subjectScaled outdoor experimenten_US
dc.subjectVentilation performanceen_US
dc.subjectWind momentum and thermal buoyancy effecten_US
dc.titleInvestigation of ventilation performance in the multi-story building with various envelope features: Scaled outdoor experimentsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage515en_US
dc.identifier.epage530en_US
dc.identifier.volume18en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12273-025-1234-xen_US
dcterms.abstractPrevious research was limited to flat-façade buildings when evaluating the indoor and outdoor ventilation performance in a multi-story building. However, envelope features can provide the shading effect to induce the temperature difference between surfaces exposed to direct solar radiation and those without solar radiation. This temperature difference between surfaces can enhance the thermal buoyancy and change indoor and outdoor ventilation performance. We conducted scaled outdoor experiments to examine the impact of various envelope features on indoor and outdoor ventilation performance in multi-story buildings. Compared to the flat-façade multi-building, the average normalized horizontal airflow velocity of overhang, small wing wall, and large wing wall multi-buildings increased by 12.41%, 10.56%, and 5.56%, respectively. Cross-ventilation is more susceptible to envelope features than single-sided ventilation in air change per hour (ACH). Specifically, the ACH values of cross-ventilation for large wing wall, small wing wall, and balcony multi-buildings decreased by 69.98%, 25.79%, and 12.12% relative to the flat-façade building. For the same envelope feature building, the ACH values of single-sided ventilation on the windward side are better than those on the leeward side, particularly the building with small wing walls, with an improvement of 12.77% compared to flat-façade. This study contributes to advancing the understanding of urban ventilation, and provides a valid basis for designing envelope features in urban buildings.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBuilding simulation, Mar. 2025, v. 18, no. 3, p. 515-530en_US
dcterms.isPartOfBuilding simulationen_US
dcterms.issued2025-03-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105001065930-
dc.identifier.eissn1996-8744en_US
dc.description.validate202507 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera3879b-
dc.identifier.SubFormID51534-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextKey Laboratory of Ecology and Energy Saving Study of Dense Habitaten_US
dc.description.fundingTextNational Natural Science Foundation of Chinaen_US
dc.description.fundingTextShenzhen Science and Technology Programen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2026-01-22en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2026-01-22
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.