Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/114104
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorEnglish Language Centre-
dc.creatorFan, Y-
dc.creatorTan, S-
dc.creatorLim, GYW-
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-11T09:11:39Z-
dc.date.available2025-07-11T09:11:39Z-
dc.identifier.issn0155-0640-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/114104-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Co.en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2024 Yiyun Fan, Sheng Tan & Grace Yuk Wan Limen_US
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Fan, Y., Tan, S., & Lim, G. Y. W. (2024). EAP teacher feedback in the age of AI: Supporting first-year students in EFL disciplinary writing. Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 1943 is available at https://doi.org/10.29140/ajal.v7n3.1943.en_US
dc.subjectDisciplinary writingen_US
dc.subjectEAP teachersen_US
dc.subjectEFL studentsen_US
dc.subjectGenAI feedbacken_US
dc.subjectStudents’ perceptionsen_US
dc.subjectTeacher feedbacken_US
dc.titleEAP teacher feedback in the age of AI : supporting first-year students in EFL disciplinary writingen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume7-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.doi10.29140/ajal.v7n3.1943-
dcterms.abstractAcademic writing is a substantial component of tertiary education, yet it poses challenges for second/foreign language students, particularly first-year undergraduates with limited pre-university exposure to English-medium instruction (EMI) settings. In this context, English for academic purposes (EAP) teachers play a crucial role in supporting these students, but little is known regarding the nature of their feedback in scholarly literature. Complicating matters further is the emergence of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) as a feedback tool, sparking ongoing debate about its efficacy in comparison with that of traditional human feedback. To address these gaps, this study investigated the nature of EAP teacher feedback on English as a foreign language (EFL) disciplinary writing, juxtaposing it against students’ perceptions of both EAP teacher feedback and AI-generated feedback. This study employed a three-layer coding scheme focusing on corrective, genre-specific, and intentional feedback to analyse the nature of EAP teacher feedback in detail. Through a comprehensive analysis of the interview themes, this study highlights the significance of EAP teacher feedback in the context of increasing integration of GenAI tools. The findings offer valuable insights into effective practices for supporting first-year EFL undergraduate students in their discipline-specific academic writing within EMI settings and demonstrate the critical role of EAP teacher feedback in assisting these students’ writing in an AI-prevalent world.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAustralian journal of applied linguistics, 2024, v. 7, no. 3, 1943-
dcterms.isPartOfAustralian review of applied linguistics-
dcterms.issued2024-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85216292807-
dc.identifier.eissn1833-7139-
dc.identifier.artn1943-
dc.description.validate202507 bcch-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera3858en_US
dc.identifier.SubFormID51449en_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextFunding from the English Language Centre, The Hong Kong Polytechnic Universityen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1943-Article Text-3737-4651-10-20241112.pdf5.16 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.