Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/113970
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Management and Marketing-
dc.creatorLi, B-
dc.creatorLai, EY-
dc.creatorWang, X-
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-04T08:35:02Z-
dc.date.available2025-07-04T08:35:02Z-
dc.identifier.issn0022-2429-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/113970-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Marketing Associationen_US
dc.rightsThis is the accepted version of the publication Li, B., Lai, E. Y., & Wang, X. (Shane). (2025). EXPRESS: From Tools to Agents: Meta-Analytic Insights into Human Acceptance of AI. Journal of Marketing, 0. Copyright © 2025 American Marketing Association. DOI: Li, B., Lai, E. Y., & Wang, X. (Shane). (2025). EXPRESS: From Tools to Agents: Meta-Analytic Insights into Human Acceptance of AI. Journal of Marketing, 0(ja). DOI: 10.1177/00222429251355266.en_US
dc.subjectArtificial intelligenceen_US
dc.subjectAI acceptanceen_US
dc.subjectAgentic AIen_US
dc.subjectHuman-AI interactionen_US
dc.subjectUser-centered designen_US
dc.subjectTechnology acceptanceen_US
dc.subjectAlgorithm aversionen_US
dc.subjectMeta-analysisen_US
dc.titleFrom tools to agents : meta-analytic insights into human acceptance of AIen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/00222429251355266-
dcterms.abstractAs artificial intelligence (AI) becomes more autonomous and socially present, it is critical to understand how people accept AI not just as a technological tool, but also as an agent capable of (semi-)autonomous decision-making and interaction. With a meta-analysis of 287 effect sizes representing over 119,000 individuals, this research examines the factors driving human acceptance of AI. Through a dual-perspectives framework, AI as a tool versus an agent, the authors identify key AI characteristics, including capability, role, expertise scope, and anthropomorphism, that significantly influence acceptance. These engineerable AI characteristics, along with contextual and individual factors, form an AI-task-user framework that explains AI acceptance across different use scenarios and user groups. These findings contribute to the discourse on AI acceptance and human-AI interactions: revealing a small, decreasing reluctance to accept AI and, more importantly, directing future research to empirical testing and theory building of AI acceptance from an agentic perspective. This research also provides actionable user-centered design roadmap for practitioners to develop and communicate AI features that align with human expectations and enhance positive responses, especially at a time when agentic AI is rapidly becoming a technological and societal reality.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of marketingFirst published online June 21, 2025, Accepted manuscripts, https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429251355266-
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of marketing-
dcterms.issued2025-
dc.identifier.eissn1547-7185-
dc.description.validate202507 bcch-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera3821en_US
dc.identifier.SubFormID51242en_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextPolyU Start-up Granten_US
dc.description.pubStatusEarly releaseen_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.