Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/113954
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Optometry-
dc.contributorResearch Centre for SHARP Vision-
dc.creatorChen, Y-
dc.creatorSong, F-
dc.creatorZhao, Z-
dc.creatorWang, Y-
dc.creatorTo, E-
dc.creatorLiu, Y-
dc.creatorShi, D-
dc.creatorChen, X-
dc.creatorXu, L-
dc.creatorShang, X-
dc.creatorLai, M-
dc.creatorHe, M-
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-04T08:34:07Z-
dc.date.available2025-07-04T08:34:07Z-
dc.identifier.issn0168-8227-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/113954-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ireland Ltd.en_US
dc.subjectAcceptabilityen_US
dc.subjectArtificial intelligenceen_US
dc.subjectCost-effectivenessen_US
dc.subjectDiabetic retinopathyen_US
dc.titleAcceptability, applicability, and cost-utility of artificial-intelligence-powered low-cost portable fundus camera for diabetic retinopathy screening in primary health care settingsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume223-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112161-
dcterms.abstractAims: To evaluate the acceptability, applicability, and cost-utility of AI-powered portable fundus cameras for diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening in Hong Kong, providing a viable alternative screening solution for resource-limited areas.-
dcterms.abstractMethods: This pragmatic trial conducted in an optometric clinic and two optical shops. A self-testing system was used, integrating a portable fundus camera and AI software that automatically identified DR. Three months following the screening, selected participants were invited to complete an open-ended questionnaire.-
dcterms.abstractResults: A total of 316 subjects participated, with age of 60.80 ± 8.30 years. The success rate of the self-testing system without active assistance was 89 %. Among 61 subjects who completed follow-up interview, a majority agreed that the system and report were easy to follow and understand (85.3 % and 75.4 %). The satisfaction rate was 64 %, and the willingness to use again was 80 %. The AI screening showed a cost saving of 6312.92 USD per QALY, while the adjusted AI model saved 18639. AI screening and adjusted model outperformed traditional screening (Net Monetary Benefit 367,863.31 and 354,904.76 vs 339,919.83 USD).-
dcterms.abstractConclusions: The AI-powered portable fundus camera demonstrated high acceptability and applicability in real-world settings, suggesting that AI screening could be a viable alternative in resource-limited settings.-
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationDiabetes research and clinical practice, May 2025, v. 223, 112161-
dcterms.isPartOfDiabetes research and clinical practice-
dcterms.issued2025-05-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105002328168-
dc.identifier.eissn1872-8227-
dc.identifier.artn112161-
dc.description.validate202507 bcch-
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera3725en_US
dc.identifier.SubFormID50870en_US
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2026-05-31en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2026-05-31
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.