Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/113822
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering-
dc.creatorXu, Y-
dc.creatorGu, Y-
dc.creatorChan, HY-
dc.creatorNi, YQ-
dc.creatorChen, A-
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-25T06:06:12Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-25T06:06:12Z-
dc.identifier.issn0966-6923-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/113822-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon Pressen_US
dc.subjectHong Kongen_US
dc.subjectMixed-integer linear programen_US
dc.subjectTrack layouten_US
dc.subjectUrban rail transit networken_US
dc.subjectVulnerability envelopeen_US
dc.titleIntegrating track layout into urban rail vulnerability envelope assessment : a case of Hong Kong rail transit networken_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume127-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2025.104271-
dcterms.abstractVulnerability envelope is a recently proposed systematic tool for analyzing transportation network vulnerability, which evaluates the lower and upper bounds of vulnerability and reveals the possible range of network performance degradations under various disruption severities. However, in urban transit systems, vulnerability envelopes are typically evaluated using a simplified node-link topology. While this approach captures service resilience through train rescheduling, flexible stops and short turnaround times enabled by redundant tracks, it often overlooks the critical role of track layout in train operations during disruptions. Moreover, it may fail to accurately reflect system behavior, as operators might close rail sections to maintain service efficiency, preventing turnback operations. This article integrates track layout into vulnerability envelope analysis for urban rail transit networks. The proposed method is demonstrated using the urban rail transit network in Hong Kong, comparing vulnerability envelopes derived from track-based and link-based approaches. By considering both physical infrastructure and operational strategies, it enhances the realism of vulnerability assessments and provides actionable insights for decision-making.-
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of transport geography, July 2025, v. 127, 104271-
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of transport geography-
dcterms.issued2025-07-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105006684244-
dc.identifier.artn104271-
dc.description.validate202506 bcwh-
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera3787en_US
dc.identifier.SubFormID51079en_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextResearch Institute for Sustainable Urban Developmenten_US
dc.description.fundingTextChinese National Engineering Research Center – Rail National Rail Transit Electrification and Automation Engineering Technology Research Centeren_US
dc.description.fundingTextPostdoc Matching Fund Scheme (W29P and W316) at the Hong Kong Polytechnic Universityen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2027-07-31en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2027-07-31
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.