Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/113461
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estate-
dc.creatorLim, YT-
dc.creatorYi, W-
dc.creatorWang, HW-
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-10T08:55:02Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-10T08:55:02Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/113461-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMolecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)en_US
dc.rights© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Lim, Y. T., Yi, W., & Wang, H. (2024). Application of Machine Learning in Construction Productivity at Activity Level: A Critical Review. Applied Sciences, 14(22), 10605 is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app142210605.en_US
dc.subjectConstruction productivityen_US
dc.subjectActivity levelen_US
dc.subjectMachine learningen_US
dc.subjectSystematic reviewen_US
dc.titleApplication of machine learning in construction productivity at activity level : a critical reviewen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume14-
dc.identifier.issue22-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/app142210605-
dcterms.abstractThere are two crucial resources (i.e., labor and equipment) of productivity in the construction industry. Productivity modeling of these resources would aid stakeholders in project management and improve construction scheduling and monitoring. Hence, this research aims to review machine learning (ML) applications in the process of construction productivity modeling (CPM) for construction labor productivity (CLP) and construction equipment productivity (CEP) from dataset acquisition to data analysis and evaluation, which includes their trends and applicability. An extensive analysis of 131 journals focused on the application of machine learning in construction productivity (ML-CP) from 1990 to 2024 via a mixed review methodology (bibliometric analysis and systematic review) was conducted. It can be concluded that despite the rise in automated dataset collection, the traditional method has its advantages. The review further found that the selection of ML models relies on each particular application, available data, and computational resources. Noticeably, artificial neural networks, convolutional neural networks, support vector machines, and even deep learning demonstrating have been adopted due to their effectiveness in different functionalities and processes in CPM. This study will supplement the insights gained in the review with a comprehensive understanding of how ML applications operate at each stage of CPM, enabling researchers to make future improvements.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationApplied sciences, Nov. 2024, v. 14, no. 22, 10605-
dcterms.isPartOfApplied sciences-
dcterms.issued2024-11-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001366844300001-
dc.identifier.eissn2076-3417-
dc.identifier.artn10605-
dc.description.validate202506 bcrc-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
applsci-14-10605-v2.pdf6.22 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

5
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.