Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/113428
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.contributorResearch Institute for Land and Spaceen_US
dc.creatorLi, Len_US
dc.creatorBi, Ken_US
dc.creatorZhao, XLen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-10T01:41:43Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-10T01:41:43Z-
dc.identifier.issn0029-8018en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/113428-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.subjectAnalytical solutionen_US
dc.subjectCharacteristic lengthen_US
dc.subjectConnector forceen_US
dc.subjectDeflectionen_US
dc.subjectModular floating structures (MFS)en_US
dc.titleCharacteristic lengths of modular floating structures (MFSs) : analytical models and potential applicationsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume335en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.121675en_US
dcterms.abstractFloating cities, built on floating structures, are seen as an attractive solution to accommodate the increasing costal population and the threat of rising sea levels. Modular floating structures (MFSs) stand out among various types of floating structures, particularly due to the small size of floaters, ease of modular construction, and re-deployment flexibility. The global response of floating structures depends on the ratio of structure length to characteristic length as well as the ratio of structure length to wave length. The characteristic length refers to the area influenced by a local perturbation, such as a concentrated load. While the structure length and wave length are relatively easy to define, determining the characteristic length requires certain efforts. Previous studies on the characteristic length were limited to mat-like (continuous) floating structures, whose models are not applicable to (discrete) MFSs, because the stiffness of MFSs varies significantly at connectors between floating modules. This study fills the knowledge gap by proposing three analytical models, which are validated through numerical simulations based on hydroelastic analysis. Additionally, several potential engineering applications of the proposed models are exemplified. The current study enables the analytical computation of MFSs under various combinations of static vertical loads and moments.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationOcean engineering, Aug. 2025, v. 335, 121675en_US
dcterms.isPartOfOcean engineeringen_US
dcterms.issued2025-08-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105007058282-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-5258en_US
dc.identifier.artn121675en_US
dc.description.validate202506 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera3650-
dc.identifier.SubFormID50575-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextInnovation and Technology Fund (ITF) Research Talent Hub of Hong Kongen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2027-08-31en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2027-08-31
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.