Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/113383
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Logistics and Maritime Studiesen_US
dc.contributorDepartment of Aeronautical and Aviation Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorYan, Ren_US
dc.creatorChu, Zen_US
dc.creatorWu, Len_US
dc.creatorWang, Sen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-04T01:34:28Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-04T01:34:28Z-
dc.identifier.issn1474-0346en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/113383-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.subjectData-driven approachen_US
dc.subjectMachine learning in port operationsen_US
dc.subjectMaritime transporten_US
dc.subjectPort management and optimizationen_US
dc.subjectVessel service time predictionen_US
dc.titlePredicting vessel service time : a data-driven approachen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume62en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aei.2024.102718en_US
dcterms.abstractVessel Service Time (VST) refers to the period from when a ship arrives at a berth until it departs. VST is a critical metric for port operational efficiency and service quality. Uncertainty in VST can undermine the operational efficiency in port management and lead to financial setbacks. To mitigate this uncertainty and lay the foundation for subsequent berth allocation, vessels typically provide an estimated departure time (EDT). However, substantial discrepancies often exist between the reported EDT and the actual departure time (ADT). These discrepancies mainly stem from unforeseen port handling inefficiencies and supply chain disruptions. This variability results in significant differences between the actual VST and its anticipated duration, thereby complicating port operations. To tackle this issue, our research represents the first study to predict VST from a data-driven perspective. We introduce an advanced tree-based stacking regression model for VST prediction, utilizing vessel port call records from 2020 to 2023. Our machine learning stacking approach achieves more accurate VST predictions than EDT reported by vessels, significantly reducing the mean absolute error (MAE) by 29.7% (from 4.54 to 3.19 h) and the root mean square error (RMSE) by 31.9% (from 6.58 to 4.48 h). The model also demonstrates reliable predictive power with an R-squared (R2) value of 0.8. These results underscore the significant scientific value of data-driven approaches in maritime studies. Our findings highlight the potential of the proposed tree-based models to surpass traditional models and originally reported data in predictive accuracy for VST. This advancement not only represents a notable improvement in predictive capabilities for VST but also lays the groundwork for further research into enhancing vessel scheduling efficiency through machine learning.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAdvanced engineering informatics, Oct. 2024, v. 62, 102718en_US
dcterms.isPartOfAdvanced engineering informaticsen_US
dcterms.issued2024-10-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85200001684-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-5320en_US
dc.identifier.artn102718en_US
dc.description.validate202506 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera3629b-
dc.identifier.SubFormID50521-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2026-10-31en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2026-10-31
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.