Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/113277
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of English and Communicationen_US
dc.creatorRogers, Jen_US
dc.creatorLi, Pen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-02T02:07:54Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-02T02:07:54Z-
dc.identifier.issn1362-1688en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/113277-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSage Publications Ltd.en_US
dc.rightsThis is the accepted version of the publication Rogers, J., & Li, P. (2025). The time between tasks in task repetition research: A systematic review. Language Teaching Research, 0(0). Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). DOI: 10.1177/13621688251323047.en_US
dc.subjectDistribution of practiceen_US
dc.subjectResearch methodologyen_US
dc.subjectSpacing effectsen_US
dc.subjectSystematic reviewen_US
dc.subjectTask repetitionen_US
dc.titleThe time between tasks in task repetition research : a systematic reviewen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/13621688251323047en_US
dcterms.abstractThis article reports on a systematic review of oral task repetition research carried out between 1996 and 2023. This review focuses on the methodological features of these studies, specifically on issues related to how tasks have been spaced and repeated within this body of research. This review starts with an overview of the concept of input spacing and the major methodological paradigms that have been used to investigate it across the psychological sciences. It then discusses task repetition, providing definitions and elaborations of theoretical models, discussing why spacing might influence task performance, and how this informs the synthesized research. The article then presents a synthesis of the methods and results of the 107 studies that have been analysed as part of the synthesis. The methodological synthesis includes analyses of how spacing has been implemented, the number of times tasks were repeated, and how researchers have justified their methodological decisions. The results of the synthesis highlight the need for greater systematicity and theoretical rationales for choice of spacing intervals, number of task repetitions, and transparency in reporting practices. The methods and results are discussed by identifying trends, exemplifying practices, and recommending solutions.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLanguage teaching research, First published online March 25, 2025, OnlineFirst, https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688251323047en_US
dcterms.isPartOfLanguage teaching researchen_US
dcterms.issued2025-
dc.identifier.eissn1477-0954en_US
dc.description.validate202505 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera3620-
dc.identifier.SubFormID50494-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusEarly releaseen_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Rogers_Time_Between_Tasks.pdf820.62 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.