Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/113204
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Land Surveying and Geo-Informatics-
dc.creatorTang, L-
dc.creatorZhang, F-
dc.creatorChen, W-
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-29T07:59:19Z-
dc.date.available2025-05-29T07:59:19Z-
dc.identifier.issn1539-4956-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/113204-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.en_US
dc.rights© 2024. The Author(s).en_US
dc.rightsThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Tang, L., Zhang, F., & Chen, W. (2024). The error of global ionospheric map-TEC during equatorial plasma bubble event in the high solar activity year. Space Weather, 22, e2023SW003714 is available at https://doi.org/10.1029/2023SW003714.en_US
dc.titleThe error of global ionospheric Map-TEC during equatorial plasma bubble event in the high solar activity yearen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume22-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.doi10.1029/2023SW003714-
dcterms.abstractIn this study, the error of total electron content (TEC) derived from the global ionospheric map (GIM) (GIM-TEC) during equatorial plasma bubble (EPB) event is investigated for the first time. The frequently-used assessment parameter of ionospheric TEC model, namely difference of Slant TEC (difference of slant total electron content (dSTEC)) is checked and employed based on eight global navigation satellite system (GNSS) stations distributed around the geomagnetic equator during the high solar activity year of 2014. The international GNSS service final GIM products are exemplified. The results present several interesting findings: (a) The observed dSTEC series is biased when an EPB is observed at the highest satellite elevation, leading to a fake bias in GIM-TEC; (b) When an EPB occurred, the error of GIM-TEC can increases or decreases and its variation sign is unrelated to the magnitude of EPB; (c) The average of the EPB-induced GIM-TEC errors is mainly at −5 to 5 TECU with 76% (24%) of positive (negative) values, and the maximum (minimum) is close to 10 TECU (−10 TECU); (d) The structure of EPB is unable to be captured by the GIM-TEC series.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSpace weather, June 2024, v. 22, no. 6, e2023SW003714-
dcterms.isPartOfSpace weather-
dcterms.issued2024-06-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85196395835-
dc.identifier.eissn1542-7390-
dc.identifier.artne2023SW003714-
dc.description.validate202505 bcch-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Othersen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number 42274017); Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (Grant number 2023A1515030184)en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Tang_Error_Global_Ionospheric.pdf503.56 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.