Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/113064
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of English and Communicationen_US
dc.creatorWang, AWen_US
dc.creatorFriginal, Een_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-19T00:52:30Z-
dc.date.available2025-05-19T00:52:30Z-
dc.identifier.issn0889-4906en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/113064-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon Pressen_US
dc.rights© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Wang, A. W., & Friginal, E. (2025). The case of English for aviation maintenance: A multi-dimensional analysis of commercial aircraft manuals. English for Specific Purposes, 79, 87-100 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2025.04.004.en_US
dc.subjectAviation maintenance Englishen_US
dc.subjectControlled languageen_US
dc.subjectCorpus linguisticsen_US
dc.subjectMulti-dimensional analysisen_US
dc.subjectRegister variationen_US
dc.titleThe case of English for aviation maintenance : a multi-dimensional analysis of commercial aircraft manualsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage87en_US
dc.identifier.epage100en_US
dc.identifier.volume79en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.esp.2025.04.004en_US
dcterms.abstractAircraft manufacturers use Simplified Technical English (STE) as a strategic tool to enhance the readability of aviation maintenance manuals and reduce comprehension errors. This standardized linguistic approach is essential for ensuring global aviation safety, especially as approximately 80% of maintenance technicians worldwide are non-native English speakers (NNES). This study employs Biber's Multi-Dimensional analysis framework (Biber, 1988, 1995, 2006) to investigate the linguistic characteristics of aviation maintenance English (AME) compared to general written English (GWE). The research is based on a 27-million-word corpus derived from maintenance manuals for all operational Boeing commercial aircraft families (737, 747, 757, 767, 777, and 787), which collectively serve over 150 countries and represent nearly half of the global fleet (Boeing, 2024). The analysis reveals that AME prioritizes informational density, minimizes abstract content, and uses comparable levels of elaboration to ensure clarity in safety-critical contexts. These findings challenge the misconception of simplified English as overly simplistic or reductive, demonstrating instead that strategic linguistic simplification enhances technical communication without compromising clarity. By highlighting the role of STE in supporting global interoperability, safety, and efficiency, this research offers valuable implications for English for Specific Purposes (ESP) pedagogy and the ongoing development of STE guidelines in aviation and other high-stakes industries.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationEnglish for specific purposes, July 2025, v. 79, p. 87-100en_US
dcterms.isPartOfEnglish for specific purposesen_US
dcterms.issued2025-07-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105004360531-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-1937en_US
dc.description.validate202505 bcwcen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_TA-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.TAElsevier (2025)en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryTAen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S0889490625000183-main.pdf498.11 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.