Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/113013
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Applied Social Sciencesen_US
dc.creatorShek, DTLen_US
dc.creatorTang, YTen_US
dc.creatorZhu, Xen_US
dc.creatorGong, Zen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-16T09:09:44Z-
dc.date.available2025-05-16T09:09:44Z-
dc.identifier.issn1661-7827en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/113013-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPI AGen_US
dc.rightsCopyright: © 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Shek, D. T. L., Tang, Y.-T., Zhu, X., & Gong, Z. (2025). Subjective Outcome Evaluation of a Positive Youth Development Program in Mainland China: Evidence in the Post-Pandemic Era. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 22(4), 613 is available at https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22040613.en_US
dc.subjectAdolescentsen_US
dc.subjectClient satisfactionen_US
dc.subjectProgram evaluationen_US
dc.subjectSecondary school studentsen_US
dc.subjectYouth programen_US
dc.titleSubjective outcome evaluation of a positive youth development program in Mainland China : evidence in the post-pandemic eraen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume22en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ijerph22040613en_US
dcterms.abstractBackground: Optimizing the development of adolescents in the post-pandemic era is an urgent concern. As an active initiative, the “Tin Ka Ping P.A.T.H.S. Project”, rooted in the “Positive Youth Development (PYD)” approach, represents a curriculum-based program aimed at fostering the psychosocial competence and well-being of adolescents. This study presents evaluation findings of the program’s effectiveness during the 2022–2023 academic year.en_US
dcterms.abstractMethods: Using a validated “36-item Subjective Outcome Evaluation scale (SOES)”, we evaluated perceptions of 2165 junior students (Mage = 13.43 years, SD = 0.70 years, 51.3% females) and 3287 senior students (Mage = 16.07 years, SD = 0.65 years, 52.8% females).en_US
dcterms.abstractResults: Replicating our previous findings before and during the pandemic, the 36-item SOES exhibited satisfactory validity and reliability in the current study. Students commonly provided favorable evaluations regarding program quality, implementer quality, and perceived benefits. Senior-grade students were more likely to perceive the program more positively.en_US
dcterms.abstractConclusions: These replications underscore the generalizability of the robustness of the 36-item SOES as a reliable evaluation measurement tool across different time periods and research backgrounds. The participants’ positive responses indicated the positive impact of the “Tin Ka Ping P.A.T.H.S. Project” in enhancing the psychosocial competence and well-being of the students across background contexts and time periods.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationInternational journal of environmental research and public health, Apr. 2025, v. 22, no. 4, 613en_US
dcterms.isPartOfInternational journal of environmental research and public healthen_US
dcterms.issued2025-04-
dc.identifier.eissn1660-4601en_US
dc.identifier.artn613en_US
dc.description.validate202505 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera3601-
dc.identifier.SubFormID50442-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextTin Ka Ping Foundation; Wofoo Foundation; The Hong Kong Polytechnic Universityen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ijerph-22-00613.pdf615.39 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.