Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/112905
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorSumbal, MSen_US
dc.creatorAmber, Qen_US
dc.creatorHashmi, FAen_US
dc.creatorChan, FTSen_US
dc.creatorTariq, Aen_US
dc.creatorNauman, Sen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-15T06:49:44Z-
dc.date.available2025-05-15T06:49:44Z-
dc.identifier.issn1936-6582en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/112905-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer New York LLCen_US
dc.subjectDigitalizationen_US
dc.subjectIndustry 4.0 and 5.0en_US
dc.subjectKnowledge workersen_US
dc.subjectProductivityen_US
dc.subjectInnovationen_US
dc.subjectSustainabilityen_US
dc.titleDigitalization trends and industry 4.0 : ensuring knowledge workers’ sustainable productivity and innovative capabilityen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10696-025-09613-wen_US
dcterms.abstractOrganizations are struggling to ensure knowledge workers’ productivity and innovative capabilities to adopt rapidly changing technologies. This study investigates this under-explored topic of impediments for knowledge workers’ sustainable productivity and innovative capabilities for digitalization and adoption of Industry 4.0 and 5.0 using multi-level and multi-dimensional research approach. Using in-depth structured literature review and refined through expert evaluation, a list of impediments was developed which was further categorized at multiple levels along with cross country comparative analyses using survey data collected from IT professionals from six countries. Analytical Hierarchal Process approach is used to prioritize impediments at four levels of impediment ranking, factors ranking, categories ranking and global ranking along with country-wise analysis to explore IT professionals’ preference. Findings suggest focus areas in three dimensions - organizational, technological, and personal along with three factors of each using relative rankings based on local and global weights. The study has significant theoretical and practical implications in relation to digitalization, knowledge workers and adoption of industry 4.0 and 5.0.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFlexible services and manufacturing journal, Published: 09 May 2025, Latest articles, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-025-09613-wen_US
dcterms.isPartOfFlexible services and manufacturing journalen_US
dcterms.issued2025-
dc.identifier.eissn1936-6590en_US
dc.description.validate202505 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera3598-
dc.identifier.SubFormID50438-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.pubStatusEarly releaseen_US
dc.date.embargo2026-05-09en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2026-05-09
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.