Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/112841
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Land Surveying and Geo-Informatics-
dc.creatorGalala, MA-
dc.creatorChen, W-
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-09T06:12:37Z-
dc.date.available2025-05-09T06:12:37Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/112841-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPI AGen_US
dc.rightsCopyright: © 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Abou Galala, M., & Chen, W. (2024). Estimation of Signal Distortion Bias Using Geometry-Free Linear Combinations. Remote Sensing, 16(23), 4463 is available at https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16234463.en_US
dc.subjectDifferential code bias (DCB)en_US
dc.subjectPrecise point positioning (PPP)en_US
dc.subjectSignal distortion bias (SDB)en_US
dc.titleEstimation of signal distortion bias using geometry-free linear combinationsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume16-
dc.identifier.issue23-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/rs16234463-
dcterms.abstractSignal distortion bias (SDB) in Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) data processing, defined as the time difference between the distorted chip and the ideal rectangular chip, leads to systematic biases in pseudoranges, affecting satellite and receiver differential code biases (DCBs). The stability of SDBs, allowing them to be treated as constant values, highlights the importance of investigating both their stability and estimation accuracy. Two different methods are used to estimate SDBs: (1) the hybrid method and (2) the geometry-free method. Data from approximately 430 stations, spanning the entire year of 2021, were analyzed to evaluate the estimation accuracy and the short-term and long-term stability of GPS SDBs. The analysis focused on two code signals: C1C (L1 Coarse/Acquisition) and C2W (L2 P(Y)). The results show that the short-term and long-term stability of GPS C1C and C2W SDBs is comparable for both methods, with only minor variations between them. Additionally, one month of data were used to validate the accuracy of estimated SDBs across different receiver groups. The results demonstrate that geometry-free SDBs provide stable satellite DCB estimates with an average bias below 0.15 ns and minimal residual biases, while hybrid SDBs provide satellite DCB estimates with an average bias below 0.20 ns. Overall, the comparison underscores the superior performance of geometry-free SDBs in achieving consistent satellite DCB estimates.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationRemote sensing, Dec. 2024, v. 16, no. 23, 4463-
dcterms.isPartOfRemote sensing-
dcterms.issued2024-12-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85211789199-
dc.identifier.eissn2072-4292-
dc.identifier.artn4463-
dc.description.validate202505 bcch-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextThe University Grants Committee of Hong Kong under the General Research Fund on the project 15229622; the Research Institute of Land and Space (project P0039273), the Hong Kong Polytechnic Universityen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
remotesensing-16-04463-v2.pdf8.9 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.