Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/112679
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Nursingen_US
dc.creatorLi, Men_US
dc.creatorLo, WYen_US
dc.creatorHu, Yen_US
dc.creatorWang, Sen_US
dc.creatorSun, TCen_US
dc.creatorTemesgen, WAen_US
dc.creatorHe, Men_US
dc.creatorLi, Yen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-25T07:51:57Z-
dc.date.available2025-04-25T07:51:57Z-
dc.identifier.issn1362-4393en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/112679-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNature Publishing Groupen_US
dc.titleMindfulness- and acceptance-based interventions for people with spinal cord injury: a scoping reviewen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage159en_US
dc.identifier.epage170en_US
dc.identifier.volume63en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41393-025-01068-yen_US
dcterms.abstractStudy design: Scoping review.en_US
dcterms.abstractObjective: To synthesize the effects of mindfulness- and acceptance-based interventions (MABIs) on health-related outcomes of individuals with spinal cord injury.en_US
dcterms.abstractSetting: The included studies were conducted across four countries: The United States, Iran, China, and The United Kingdom.en_US
dcterms.abstractMethods: This review followed the Arksey and O’Malley framework and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guideline. Seven databases were searched until November 2024 to identify studies published in English-language that evaluated MABIs’ effects on health-related outcomes in people with spinal cord injury. Literature screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted by two reviewers independently. A narrative data synthesis was conducted.en_US
dcterms.abstractResults: Of 2389 records, nine studies were included with designs of randomized controlled trials (n = 4), quasi-experimental studies (n = 3), and case studies (n = 2). Acceptance commitment therapy (n = 4) and mindfulness-based interventions (n = 5) were employed. MABIs demonstrated significant improvements in psychological health outcomes (depression, n = 3; anxiety, n = 3; stress, n = 2) with medium-to-large effect sizes (n2p = 0.112 - 0.223) and other health-related outcomes (chronic pain, n = 1; functional independence, n = 1; engagement in meaningful activities, n = 1; and quality of life, n = 1). Participants found the MABIs to be acceptable and satisfactory. Study quality varied from weak (n = 6) to strong (n = 2).en_US
dcterms.abstractConclusions: The findings generally support the acceptability and effectiveness of MABIs for improving the overall well-being of individuals with SCI. Future research directions regarding designing MABIs and exploring effectiveness mechanisms were recommended for maximizing its benefits.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSpinal cord, Mar. 2025, v. 63, no. 3, p. 159-170en_US
dcterms.isPartOfSpinal corden_US
dcterms.issued2025-03-
dc.identifier.eissn1476-5624en_US
dc.description.validate202504 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera3556a-
dc.identifier.SubFormID50352-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.date.embargo2026-02-26en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2026-02-26
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.