Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/112665
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorBao, Xen_US
dc.creatorLi, Yen_US
dc.creatorZhang, Xen_US
dc.creatorWu, Xen_US
dc.creatorChen, Xen_US
dc.creatorCui, Hen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-25T02:48:26Z-
dc.date.available2025-04-25T02:48:26Z-
dc.identifier.issn0141-0296en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/112665-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon Pressen_US
dc.rights© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Bao, X., Li, Y., Zhang, X., Wu, X., Chen, X., & Cui, H. (2025). Mechanical behaviors of hybrid fiber-rebar reinforced concrete lining under ground surcharge loads—3d numerical simulation combined with full-scale test. Engineering Structures, 334, 120257 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120257.en_US
dc.subjectHybrid fiber-reinforced concrete (HFRC)en_US
dc.subjectNonlinear numerical analysisen_US
dc.subjectSegment ringen_US
dc.subjectShield tunnelen_US
dc.subjectStructural behavioren_US
dc.titleMechanical behaviors of hybrid fiber-rebar reinforced concrete lining under ground surcharge loads—3d numerical simulation combined with full-scale testen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume334en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120257en_US
dcterms.abstractTraditional reinforced concrete (RC) segments used in shield tunnel linings face limitations in crack resistance and durability, while hybrid fiber-reinforced concrete (HFRC) offers a promising solution to enhance its long-term performance. However, significant knowledge gaps remain regarding the application of HFRC in conjunction with steel reinforcement rebars to improve the structural performance of segmental linings. This study examines the mechanical performance of tunnel linings constructed using four types of segments, namely traditional RC, unreinforced HFRC (UR-HFRC), partially reinforced HFRC (PR-HFRC), and fully reinforced HFRC (FR-HFRC). A refined three-dimensional finite element model (3D FEM) was developed, incorporating a constitutive model for HFRC derived from laboratory tests. The accuracy of the 3D FEM was validated against full-scale load test results. Key findings include: the FR-HFRC segment ring demonstrates the highest ultimate bearing capacity and enhances subsequent stiffness during the hardening phase compared to RC segments. In reinforced segments (RC, PR-HFRC, FR-HFRC), rebars effectively mitigate cross-sectional yielding; however, this advantage comes at the cost of successive plastic hinge formation at segment joints during ultimate failure. Both bolts and reinforcement play a crucial role in load distribution, with HFRC enhancing the synergy between bolts and segments, thereby reducing reinforcement stress levels. Nevertheless, the stress in the reinforcement rarely reaches the yield point, suggesting potential underutilization in certain cases. By optimizing material configurations, HFRC can potentially offer an efficient and cost-effective solution for tunnel lining construction.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationEngineering structures, 1 July 2025, v. 334, 120257en_US
dcterms.isPartOfEngineering structuresen_US
dcterms.issued2025-07-01-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105002236231-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-7323en_US
dc.identifier.artn120257en_US
dc.description.validate202504 bcwcen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_TA-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextNational Key R&D Program of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Shenzhen Science and Technology Programen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.TAElsevier (2025)en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryTAen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S0141029625006480-main.pdf13.22 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

10
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.