Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/112595
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor | Department of Applied Social Sciences | en_US |
| dc.creator | Liu, J | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-04-22T06:39:54Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-04-22T06:39:54Z | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0306-6150 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/112595 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Routledge | en_US |
| dc.rights | © 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group | en_US |
| dc.rights | This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in the Journal of peasant studies on 25 Feb 2021 (published online), available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2021.1873290. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Abolition of agricultural taxes | en_US |
| dc.subject | Clientelism | en_US |
| dc.subject | Moral economy | en_US |
| dc.subject | Oarty patronage | en_US |
| dc.subject | Rural China | en_US |
| dc.title | The abolition of agricultural taxes and the transformation of clientelism in the countryside of post-Mao China | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.spage | 585 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.epage | 603 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.volume | 49 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/03066150.2021.1873290 | en_US |
| dcterms.abstract | A substantial body of research has revealed the historical transformation of clientelism in the countryside of capitalist societies. Although rural China has distinct politico-economic structures, I argue that the framework of clientelist transformation also fits it. I identify the abolition of agricultural taxes as a watershed moment in facilitating the transformation. This national policy marked a dramatic change in state-peasant relations from state extraction based on taxes to state provision of economic subsidies, state extraction through land expropriation, and market extraction through wage labor and contract farming. In the former relation, clientelism based on the ethics of egalitarian distribution and subsistence security protected peasants from excessive extraction. In the latter, clientelism based on external linkages is instrumental for peasants to access state and market resources. The new clientelism widens the economic inequality and facilitates class conflicts within villages; it also opens villages up to more state and market extraction. | en_US |
| dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Journal of peasant studies, 2022, v. 49, no. 3, p. 585-603 | en_US |
| dcterms.isPartOf | Journal of peasant studies | en_US |
| dcterms.issued | 2022 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1743-9361 | en_US |
| dc.description.validate | 202504 bcch | en_US |
| dc.description.oa | Accepted Manuscript | en_US |
| dc.identifier.FolderNumber | a3548 [non PolyU] | - |
| dc.identifier.SubFormID | 50333 | - |
| dc.description.fundingSource | Self-funded | en_US |
| dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
| dc.description.oaCategory | Green (AAM) | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liu_Abolition_Agricultural_Taxes.pdf | Pre-Published version | 976.42 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



