Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/112595
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Applied Social Sciencesen_US
dc.creatorLiu, Jen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-22T06:39:54Z-
dc.date.available2025-04-22T06:39:54Z-
dc.identifier.issn0306-6150en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/112595-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_US
dc.rights© 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Groupen_US
dc.rightsThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in the Journal of peasant studies on 25 Feb 2021 (published online), available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2021.1873290.en_US
dc.subjectAbolition of agricultural taxesen_US
dc.subjectClientelismen_US
dc.subjectMoral economyen_US
dc.subjectOarty patronageen_US
dc.subjectRural Chinaen_US
dc.titleThe abolition of agricultural taxes and the transformation of clientelism in the countryside of post-Mao Chinaen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage585en_US
dc.identifier.epage603en_US
dc.identifier.volume49en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/03066150.2021.1873290en_US
dcterms.abstractA substantial body of research has revealed the historical transformation of clientelism in the countryside of capitalist societies. Although rural China has distinct politico-economic structures, I argue that the framework of clientelist transformation also fits it. I identify the abolition of agricultural taxes as a watershed moment in facilitating the transformation. This national policy marked a dramatic change in state-peasant relations from state extraction based on taxes to state provision of economic subsidies, state extraction through land expropriation, and market extraction through wage labor and contract farming. In the former relation, clientelism based on the ethics of egalitarian distribution and subsistence security protected peasants from excessive extraction. In the latter, clientelism based on external linkages is instrumental for peasants to access state and market resources. The new clientelism widens the economic inequality and facilitates class conflicts within villages; it also opens villages up to more state and market extraction.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of peasant studies, 2022, v. 49, no. 3, p. 585-603en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of peasant studiesen_US
dcterms.issued2022-
dc.identifier.eissn1743-9361en_US
dc.description.validate202504 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera3548 [non PolyU]-
dc.identifier.SubFormID50333-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Liu_Abolition_Agricultural_Taxes.pdfPre-Published version976.42 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.