Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/112418
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of English and Communicationen_US
dc.creatorLam, PWYen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-11T01:45:17Z-
dc.date.available2025-04-11T01:45:17Z-
dc.identifier.issn0143-4632en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/112418-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_US
dc.subjectGovernmenten_US
dc.subjectHong Kongen_US
dc.subjectInstitutionen_US
dc.subjectLanguage useen_US
dc.subjectProfessional communicationen_US
dc.subjectWorkplaceen_US
dc.titleStill business as usual? The use of English by language professionals across the government of Hong Kongen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01434632.2025.2476686en_US
dcterms.abstractThis study provides a rare, updated and focused account of the use of English vis-a-vis Chinese in the public sector of Hong Kong by researching the language use, needs and challenges of a cohort of freshly employed Official Languages Officers working across the government of Hong Kong. Through a mixed-method approach incorporating results from a questionnaire survey, focus-group discussions and case studies, the study has identified the major languages used in governmental workplaces, the most common language-related tasks performed and the languages used for the tasks, and the challenges associated with the tasks. Findings from the present study show that while both Chinese and English are predominant in governmental workplaces, their patterns of use vary according to a number of factors, most notably mode, audience and task type. When performing communicative tasks, these language professionals encounter a diverse and varied range of challenges concerning field knowledge, linguistic competence and personality conflict which apply not only to English but also to Chinese. In sum, while the overall patterns of language use seem to suggest business as usual as it was reported before, there are subtle indications that the institutional and administrative role of English continues to decline in the city’s government.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsembargoed accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of multilingual and multicultural development, Published online: 12 Mar 2025, Latest Articles, https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2025.2476686en_US
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of multilingual and multicultural developmenten_US
dcterms.issued2025-
dc.identifier.eissn1747-7557en_US
dc.description.validate202504 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaNot applicableen_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera3524-
dc.identifier.SubFormID50294-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusEarly releaseen_US
dc.date.embargo2026-09-12en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2026-09-12
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

12
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.