Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/112079
| Title: | Using high-repeatable radiomic features improves the cross-institutional generalization of prognostic model in esophageal squamous cell cancer receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy | Authors: | Gong, J Wang, Q Li, J Yang, Z Zhang, J Teng, X Sun, H Cai, J Zhao, L |
Issue Date: | Dec-2024 | Source: | Insights into imaging, Dec. 2024, v. 15, no. 1, 239 | Abstract: | Objectives: Repeatability is crucial for ensuring the generalizability and clinical utility of radiomics-based prognostic models. This study aims to investigate the repeatability of radiomic feature (RF) and its impact on the cross-institutional generalizability of the prognostic model for predicting local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS) in esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) receiving definitive (chemo) radiotherapy (dCRT). Methods: Nine hundred and twelve patients from two hospitals were included as training and external validation sets, respectively. Image perturbations were applied to contrast-enhanced computed tomography to generate perturbed images. Six thousand five hundred ten RFs from different feature types, bin widths, and filters were extracted from the original and perturbed images separately to evaluate RF repeatability by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The high-repeatable and low-repeatable RF groups grouped by the median ICC were further analyzed separately by feature selection and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model for predicting LRFS and OS. Results: First-order statistical features were more repeatable than texture features (median ICC: 0.70 vs 0.42–0.62). RFs from LoG had better repeatability than that of wavelet (median ICC: 0.70–0.84 vs 0.14–0.64). Features with smaller bin widths had higher repeatability (median ICC of 8–128: 0.65–0.47). For both LRFS and OS, the performance of the models based on high- and low-repeatable RFs remained stable in the training set with similar C-index (LRFS: 0.65 vs 0.67, p = 0.958; OS: 0.64 vs 0.65, p = 0.651), while the performance of the model based on the low-repeatable group was significantly lower than that based on the high-repeatable group in the external validation set (LRFS: 0.61 vs 0.67, p = 0.013; OS: 0.56 vs 0.63, p = 0.013). Conclusions: Applying high-repeatable RFs in modeling could safeguard the cross-institutional generalizability of the prognostic model in ESCC. |
Keywords: | Esophageal cancer Local recurrence-free survival Overall survival Radiomics Repeatability |
Publisher: | SpringerOpen | Journal: | Insights into imaging | EISSN: | 1869-4101 | DOI: | 10.1186/s13244-024-01816-3 | Rights: | © The Author(s) 2024. Open access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The following publication Gong, J., Wang, Q., Li, J. et al. Using high-repeatable radiomic features improves the cross-institutional generalization of prognostic model in esophageal squamous cell cancer receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy. Insights Imaging 15, 239 (2024) is available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-024-01816-3. |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| s13244-024-01816-3.pdf | 2.3 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
1
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025
Downloads
1
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025
SCOPUSTM
Citations
3
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



