Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/112070
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorEducational Development Centre-
dc.creatorGatrell, D-
dc.creatorMark, K-
dc.creatorAu-Yeung, C-
dc.creatorLeung, KY-
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-27T03:13:23Z-
dc.date.available2025-03-27T03:13:23Z-
dc.identifier.issn1360-2357-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/112070-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer New York LLCen_US
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2024en_US
dc.rightsThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Gatrell, D., Mark, K., Au-Yeung, C. et al. Using expansive learning to design and implement video-annotated peer feedback in an undergraduate general education module. Educ Inf Technol 30, 2999–3033 (2025) is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12934-2.en_US
dc.subjectExpansive learningen_US
dc.subjectFormative interventionen_US
dc.subjectPeer feedbacken_US
dc.subjectVideoen_US
dc.subjectVideo annotationen_US
dc.titleUsing expansive learning to design and implement video-annotated peer feedback in an undergraduate general education moduleen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage2999-
dc.identifier.epage3033-
dc.identifier.volume30-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10639-024-12934-2-
dcterms.abstractExisting studies have measured the effect of video-based feedback on student performance or satisfaction. Other issues are underacknowledged or merit further investigation. These include sociocultural aspects which may shape the design and implementation of video-based feedback, the ways students use technology to engage in feedback, and the processes through technology may transform learning. This study investigates the design and implementation of a video-annotated peer feedback activity to develop students’ presentation skills and knowledge of climate science. It explores how their use of a video annotation tool re-mediated established feedback practices and how the systematic analysis of contradictions in emerging practices informed the subsequent redesign and reimplementation of the approach. Employing a formative intervention design, the researchers intervened in the activity system of a first-year undergraduate education module to facilitate two cycles of expansive learning with an instructor and two groups of Hong Kong Chinese students (n = 97, n = 94) across two semesters. Instructor interviews, student surveys, and video annotation and system data were analysed using Activity Theory-derived criteria to highlight contradictions in each system and suggest how these could be overcome. The findings highlight the critical importance of active instructor facilitation; building student motivation by embedding social-affective support and positioning peer feedback as an integrated, formative process; and supporting students’ use of appropriate cognitive scaffolding to encourage their interactive, efficient use of the annotation tool. Conclusions: In a field dominated by experimental and quasi-experimental studies, this study reveals how an Activity Theory-derived research design and framework can be used to systemically analyse cycles of design and implementation of video-annotated peer feedback. It also suggests how the new activity system might be consolidated and generalised.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationEducation and information technologies, Feb. 2025, v. 30, no. 3, p. 2999-3033-
dcterms.isPartOfEducation and information technologies-
dcterms.issued2025-02-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85200872972-
dc.identifier.eissn1573-7608-
dc.description.validate202503 bcch-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextUniversity Grants Committee, Hong Kongen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s10639-024-12934-2.pdf1.36 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

1
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

1
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.