Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/112006
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Applied Social Sciencesen_US
dc.creatorLi, Ben_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-21T02:22:46Z-
dc.date.available2025-03-21T02:22:46Z-
dc.identifier.issn0277-9536en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/112006-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamonen_US
dc.rights© 2025 The Author. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Li, B. (2025). The power paradox of patient-centred care in Chinese Community Health: Towards a conceptualisation. Social Science and Medicine, 371, 117883 is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117883.en_US
dc.subjectCommunity healthcareen_US
dc.subjectDoctor-patient relationshipsen_US
dc.subjectGeneral practiceen_US
dc.subjectHypertension managementen_US
dc.subjectPatient-centred careen_US
dc.subjectPoweren_US
dc.titleThe power paradox of patient-centred care in chinese community health : towards a conceptualisationen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume371en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117883en_US
dcterms.abstractPatient-centred care (PCC) is widely heralded as a transformative healthcare paradigm, designed to prioritise patients' unique needs, preferences, and values in clinical decision-making. By potentially shifting away from the historically provider-centric model, PCC aims to empower patients as autonomous, active participants. However, critical questions remain: Does PCC genuinely dismantle power asymmetries, or does it merely serve as rhetoric subtly reinforcing existing hierarchies under the guise of empowerment? This study examines this power paradox—the disconnect between PCC's rhetorical positioning and its superficial implementation—through Steven Lukes' three dimensions of power, focusing on China's community healthcare system, where patient-centred ideals are strongly advocated. A year-long non-participant observation at a major community health centre in Shenzhen, complemented by semi-structured interviews with 16 general practitioners (GPs) and 18 hypertensive patients (HPs), informed an iterative thematic analysis. The analysis identified three paradoxes that complicate PCC's vision of patient empowerment. First, protective authority demonstrates how GPs' protective intentions manifest as directive behaviours, fostering dependency and limiting patient agency. Second, framing authority reveals how organisational norms, policies, and clinical expectations constrain patient choice, prioritising compliance over autonomy. Lastly, internalised compliance highlights PCC's ideological power, where HPs internalise adherence as integral to their identity as ‘good’ patients, embedding deference to medical authority within their sense of well-being. These findings offer critical insights into PCC's power paradox, questioning its theoretical capacity to redress entrenched provider-patient power imbalances. Addressing these challenges necessitates systemic reforms and shifts in clinical practice to genuinely prioritise patient-centredness.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSocial science and medicine, Apr. 2025, v. 371, 117883en_US
dcterms.isPartOfSocial science and medicineen_US
dcterms.issued2025-04-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85218871135-
dc.identifier.artn117883en_US
dc.description.validate202503 bcwcen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_TA-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextHong Kong Polytechnic Universityen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.TAElsevier (2025)en_US
dc.description.oaCategoryTAen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S0277953625002126-main.pdf511.8 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.