Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/111858
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
Title: Validation of GRACE/GRACE-FO solutions using Caspian Sea level change
Authors: Chen, J 
Wilson, C
Seo, K
Cazenave, A
Wang, S
Li, J
Nie, Y 
Issue Date: 2024
Source: IEEE journal of selected topics in applied earth observations and remote sensing, 2024, v. 17, p. 15885-15899
Abstract: To validate GRACE/GRACE-FO gravity solutions, we compare satellite altimetry observations of Caspian Sea Level (CSL) change with CSL estimates from satellite gravity for April 2002 to December 2020. We use GRACE/GRACE-FO Release 6 (RL06) GSM fields (spherical harmonics (SH)) from the three processing centers (Center for Space Research-CSR, Jet Propulsion Laboratory-JPL, and Geoscience Research Center-GFZ) and three mascon solutions from CSR, JPL, and Goddard Space Flight Center-GSFC. CSL change is a regional scale signal that should be reasonably well resolved by satellite gravity measurements, but spatial leakage and other corrections are still required. We computed an average of smoothed SH solutions and those that are both smoothed and decorrelation filtered (to remove north-south stripe noise). Averaging mitigates attenuating effects of decorrelation filtering on the north-south oriented Caspian Sea Signal. After spatial leakage, terrestrial water storage, and steric corrections, most GRACE/GRACE-FO CSL estimates agree remarkably well with the altimetry series over a range of time scales as measured by trend and seasonal components and at other frequencies. The linear CSL trend from altimetry is -7.55±0.17 cm/yr, while GRACE/GRACE-FO values range from -7.30±0.17 to -8.66±0.20 cm/yr. Annual amplitudes from altimetry are (17.75±1.28 cm) with GRACE/GRACE-FO values in the range 17.05±1.49 to 19.16±1.55 cm, with good phase agreement. The GSFC mascon solution shows substantially smaller annual amplitude (11.62±1.04 cm) than others. We found no bias between GRACE and GRACE-FO, but GRACE-FO shows larger RMS differences from altimetry. Among the three standard SH solutions, those from CSR show the best agreement with altimetry.
Keywords: Caspian sea level
GRACE/GRACE-FO
Gravity
Satellite altimeter
Satellite gravimetry
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
Journal: IEEE journal of selected topics in applied earth observations and remote sensing 
ISSN: 1939-1404
EISSN: 2151-1535
DOI: 10.1109/JSTARS.2024.3448488
Rights: © 2024 The Authors. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
The following publication J. Chen et al., "Validation of GRACE/GRACE-FO Solutions Using Caspian Sea Level Change," in IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, vol. 17, pp. 15885-15899 is available at https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2024.3448488.
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Chen_Validation_GRACE_GRACE-FO.pdf3.5 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page views

6
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

3
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.