Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/111768
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Design-
dc.creatorChellappa, V-
dc.creatorLuximon, Y-
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-14T03:56:59Z-
dc.date.available2025-03-14T03:56:59Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/111768-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.rights© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Chellappa, V., & Luximon, Y. (2024). Understanding the perception of design students towards ChatGPT. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100281 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100281.en_US
dc.subjectArtificial intelligenceen_US
dc.subjectChatGPTen_US
dc.subjectDesign educationen_US
dc.subjectStudents' perceptionsen_US
dc.titleUnderstanding the perception of design students towards ChatGPTen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume7-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100281-
dcterms.abstractThe benefits of artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled language models, such as ChatGPT, have contributed to their growing popularity in education. However, there is currently a lack of evidence regarding the perception of ChatGPT, specifically among design students. This study aimed to understand the product design (PD) and user experience design (UXD) students' views on ChatGPT and focused on an Indian university. The study employed a survey research design, utilizing questionnaires as the primary data collection method. The collected data (n = 149) was analyzed using descriptive statistics (i.e., frequency, percentage, average, and standard deviation (SD). Inferential statistics (i.e., one-way ANOVA) was used to understand the significant differences between the programs of study, gender, and academic level. The findings indicate that the students expressed admiration for the capabilities of ChatGPT and found it to be an interesting and helpful tool for their studies. In addition, the students' motivation towards using ChatGPT was moderate. Furthermore, the study observed significant differences between PD and UXD students and differences based on gender and academic level on certain variables. Notably, UXD students reported that ChatGPT does not understand their questions well, and formulating effective prompts for the tool was more challenging than for PD students. Based on the findings, the study recommends how educators should consider integrating ChatGPT into design education curricula and pedagogical practices. The insights aim to contribute to refining the use of ChatGPT in educational settings and exploring avenues for improving its effectiveness, ultimately advancing the field of AI in design education.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationComputers & education. Artificial intelligence, Dec. 2024, v. 7, 100281-
dcterms.isPartOfComputers & education. Artificial intelligence-
dcterms.issued2024-12-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85201761722-
dc.identifier.eissn2666-920X-
dc.identifier.artn100281-
dc.description.validate202503 bcch-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S2666920X24000845-main.pdf611.83 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

15
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

3
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.