Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/111722
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Nursing-
dc.creatorGalgani, S-
dc.creatorSawyer, C-
dc.creatorKing, J-
dc.creatorDockry, R-
dc.creatorWingfieldDigby, J-
dc.creatorHolt, K-
dc.creatorMitchell, J-
dc.creatorSen, S-
dc.creatorBirchall, D-
dc.creatorSolari, F-
dc.creatorSmith, J-
dc.creatorYorke, J-
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-13T02:24:59Z-
dc.date.available2025-03-13T02:24:59Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/111722-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBMJ Groupen_US
dc.rights© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Published by BMJ.en_US
dc.rightsThis is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Shannon Galgani, Chelsea Sawyer, Jenny King, Rachel Dockry, James Wingfield-Digby, Kimberly Holt, Joanne Mitchell, Shilpi Sen, Danielle Birchall, Francesca Solari, Jacky Smith, Janelle Yorke - Development and validation of a novel questionnaire to describe and assess sensations and triggers associated with refractory and unexplained chronic cough: BMJ Open Respiratory Research 2024;11:e002430 is available at https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002430.en_US
dc.titleDevelopment and validation of a novel questionnaire to describe and assess sensations and triggers associated with refractory and unexplained chronic coughen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume11-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002430-
dcterms.abstractINTRODUCTION: Refractory or unexplained chronic cough (RUCC) is a common clinical problem with no effective diagnostic tools. The Sensations and Triggers Provoking Cough questionnaire (TOPIC) was developed to characterise cough in RUCC versus cough in other conditions.-
dcterms.abstractMETHODS: Content analysis of participant interviews discussing the sensations and triggers of chronic cough informed TOPIC development. Participants with chronic cough completed the draft-TOPIC (a subset repeating 5-7 days later), St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), Cough Severity Diary (CSD) and Global Rating of Change Scale. The draft-TOPIC item list was reduced in hierarchical and Rasch analysis to refine the questionnaire to the TOPIC.-
dcterms.abstractRESULTS: 49 items describing the triggers and sensations of cough were generated from participant interviews (RUCC n=14, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) n=11, interstitial lung disease (ILD) n=10, asthma n=11, bronchiectasis n=3, cystic fibrosis n=7). 140 participants (median age 60.0 (19.0-88.0), female 56.4%; RUCC n=39, ILD n=38, asthma n=45, COPD n=6, bronchiectasis n=12) completed draft-TOPIC, where items with poor 'fit' for RUCC were removed to create TOPIC (8 trigger items, 7 sensation items). Median TOPIC score was significantly higher in RUCC (37.0) vs ILD (24.5, p=0.009) and asthma (7.0, p<0.001), but not bronchiectasis (20.0, p=0.318) or COPD (18.5, p=0.238), likely due to small sample sizes. The Rasch model demonstrated excellent fit in RUCC (χ2=22.04, p=0.85; PSI=0.88); as expected. When all participant groups were included, fit was no longer demonstrated (χ2=66.43, p=0.0001, PSI=0.89) due to the increased heterogeneity (CI=0.077). TOPIC correlated positively with SGRQ (r=0.47, p<0.001) and CSD (r=0.63, p<0.001). The test-retest reliability of TOPIC (intraclass correlation coefficient) was excellent (r=0.90, p<0.001).-
dcterms.abstractCONCLUSIONS: High TOPIC scores in the RUCC patients suggest their cough is characterised by specific sensations and triggers. Validation of TOPIC in cough clinics may demonstrate value as an aid to identify features of RUCC versus cough in other conditions.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBMJ open respiratory research, 2024, v. 11, no. 1, e002430-
dcterms.isPartOfBMJ open respiratory research-
dcterms.issued2024-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85201345355-
dc.identifier.pmid39142695-
dc.identifier.eissn2052-4439-
dc.identifier.artne002430-
dc.description.validate202502 bcrc-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextNIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centreen_US
dc.description.fundingTextWellcome Investigator Awarden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
e002430.full.pdf2.08 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

4
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

3
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

7
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

4
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.