Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/111491
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering-
dc.creatorEllwood, R-
dc.creatorStratoudaki, T-
dc.creatorSharples, SD-
dc.creatorClark, M-
dc.creatorSomekh, MG-
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-03T06:01:23Z-
dc.date.available2025-03-03T06:01:23Z-
dc.identifier.issn0001-4966-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/111491-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAIP Publishing LLCen_US
dc.rights© 2015 Acoustical Society of America. This article may be downloaded for personal use only. Any other use requires prior permission of the author and the Acoustical Society of America.en_US
dc.rightsThe following article appeared in R. Ellwood, T. Stratoudaki, S. D. Sharples, M. Clark, M. G. Somekh; Imaging textural variation in the acoustoelastic coefficient of aluminum using surface acoustic waves. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1 November 2015; 138 (5): 2811–2819 and may be found at https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4934270.en_US
dc.titleImaging textural variation in the acoustoelastic coefficient of aluminum using surface acoustic wavesen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage2811-
dc.identifier.epage2819-
dc.identifier.volume138-
dc.identifier.issue5-
dc.identifier.doi10.1121/1.4934270-
dcterms.abstractMuch interest has arisen in nonlinear acoustic techniques because of their reported sensitivity to variations in residual stress, fatigue life, and creep damage when compared to traditional linear ultrasonic techniques. However, there is also evidence that the nonlinear acoustic properties are also sensitive to material microstructure. As many industrially relevant materials have a polycrystalline structure, this could potentially complicate the monitoring of material processes when using nonlinear acoustics. Variations in the nonlinear acoustoelastic coefficient on the same length scale as the microstructure of a polycrystalline sample of aluminum are investigated in this paper. This is achieved by the development of a measurement protocol that allows imaging of the acoustoelastic response of a material across a samples surface at the same time as imaging the microstructure. The development, validation, and limitations of this technique are discussed. The nonlinear acoustic response is found to vary spatially by a large factor (>20) between different grains. A relationship is observed when the spatial variation of the acoustoelastic coefficient is compared to the variation in material microstructure.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of the Acoustical Society of America, Nov. 2015, v. 138, no. 5, p. 2811-2819-
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of the Acoustical Society of America-
dcterms.issued2015-11-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84946780696-
dc.identifier.eissn1520-8524-
dc.description.validate202503 bcch-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Othersen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextUK RCNDE (Research Centre in Nondestructive Evaluation); UK TSB (Technology Strategy Board)en_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryVoR alloweden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2811_1_online.pdf2.33 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

8
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

3
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

10
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.