Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/111080
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineeringen_US
dc.contributorResearch Institute for Smart Energyen_US
dc.contributorPhotonics Research Instituteen_US
dc.creatorChandran, HTen_US
dc.creatorMahadevan, Sen_US
dc.creatorMa, Ren_US
dc.creatorTang, Yen_US
dc.creatorZhu, Ten_US
dc.creatorZhu, Fen_US
dc.creatorTsang, SWen_US
dc.creatorLi, Gen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-17T01:37:13Z-
dc.date.available2025-02-17T01:37:13Z-
dc.identifier.issn0003-6951en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/111080-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAIP Publishing LLCen_US
dc.rights© 2024 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.en_US
dc.rightsThis article may be downloaded for personal use only. Any other use requires prior permission of the author and AIP Publishing. This article appeared in Hrisheekesh Thachoth Chandran, Sudhi Mahadevan, Ruijie Ma, Yu Tang, Tao Zhu, Furong Zhu, Sai-Wing Tsang, Gang Li; Deriving the linear dynamic range of next-generation thin-film photodiodes: Pitfalls and guidelines. Appl. Phys. Lett. 4 March 2024; 124 (10): 101113 and may be found at https://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0184847.en_US
dc.titleDeriving the linear dynamic range of next-generation thin-film photodiodes : pitfalls and guidelinesen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage101113-1en_US
dc.identifier.epage101113-6en_US
dc.identifier.volume124en_US
dc.identifier.issue10en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1063/5.0184847en_US
dcterms.abstractWith the use of next-generation semiconductors, notably organic and perovskite materials with remarkable optoelectronic and mechanical properties, thin-film photodiodes are progressing rapidly to rival their inorganic counterparts. However, to ensure a trustworthy comparison among the reported works, it is imperative that the measurement techniques for the figure of merits be unified and standardized. In this Letter, the possible causes of misrepresentation in the linear dynamic range (LDR) values are thoroughly discussed. The role of unity slope in defining the deviation point is examined, and the chances of misinterpretation when adopting different definitions are explained using a representative organic photodiode system. Furthermore, certain criteria are put out to standardize the LDR representation, which could be a crucial step toward facilitating the progress in this promising field via a more rational comparison of literature reports.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationApplied physics letters, 4 Mar. 2024, v. 124, no. 10, 101113, p. 101113-1 - 101113-6en_US
dcterms.isPartOfApplied physics lettersen_US
dcterms.issued2024-03-04-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85187200985-
dc.identifier.eissn1077-3118en_US
dc.identifier.artn101113en_US
dc.description.validate202502 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Others-
dc.description.fundingSourceRGCen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextShenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission; Hong Kong Polytechnic University [Sir Sze-yuen Chung Endowed Professorship Funden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryVoR alloweden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
101113_1_5.0184847.pdf1.98 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

13
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

7
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.