Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/110827
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Designen_US
dc.creatorDas, Men_US
dc.creatorLau, Nen_US
dc.creatorZhang, Wen_US
dc.creatorTang, Ken_US
dc.creatorLeung, Den_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-10T01:37:07Z-
dc.date.available2025-02-10T01:37:07Z-
dc.identifier.issn2325-128Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/110827-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCommon Ground Research Networksen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2024, Common Ground Research Networks, All Rights Reserveden_US
dc.rightsThis manuscript was accepted for publication in the International Journal of Design Education on September 05, 2024.en_US
dc.subjectCollaborative learningen_US
dc.subjectCommunication styleen_US
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_US
dc.subjectDesign studentsen_US
dc.subjectMyers-Briggs Type Index (MBTI)en_US
dc.subjectPersonalityen_US
dc.subjectProject-Based Learning (PBL)en_US
dc.titleComparative study exploring personality-communication correlation in design students and its impact on offline/online collaborative learningen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage29en_US
dc.identifier.epage55en_US
dc.identifier.volume19en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.18848/2325-128X/CGP/v19i01/29-55en_US
dcterms.abstractBackground: Collaborative learning is a common teaching strategy in design education. This study analyzes the correlation between personality types, communication styles, and the learning outcomes of design students in collaborative learning in both online and offline modes of teaching. The traditional approach of face-to-face learning had to be quickly adjusted to the hybrid or online mode of teaching and learning in the face of the onset of the pandemic COVID-19 over the last three years.en_US
dcterms.abstractMethods: By comparing the data collected from two academic years, the study compares the different correlations in conducting online and offline collaborative learning environments. Students’ personality and communication style are analyzed through the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and a four-type communication model.en_US
dcterms.abstractResults: The findings indicate that students face a variety of challenges in online and offline collaborative learning activities and that the correlation between personality types, personality styles, and learning outcomes is different. In the offline environment, the personality traits of thinking (T) and the personality temperament of intuitive thinking (NT) are positively correlated with learning outcomes. Among the four communication styles, directors are positively correlated with learning outcomes. In an online environment, having the personality trait of extroversion (E) and the personality temperament of intuitive feeling (NF) are positively connected with learning outcomes. Socializer is a communication style that is closely correlated with learning outcomes.en_US
dcterms.abstractConclusion: This study points out that when organizing online collaborative learning, students face challenges in building an intimate and comfortable group atmosphere, while offline learning requires more leadership-quality team members. The findings help educators understand student personalities, help teachers organize learning activities more effectively for better collaborative learning outcomes, and provide students with equal opportunities for learning success.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationThe international journal of design education, 30 June 2025, v. 19, no. 1, p. 29-55en_US
dcterms.isPartOfThe international journal of design educationen_US
dcterms.issued2025-06-30-
dc.identifier.eissn2325-1298en_US
dc.description.validate202502 bcchen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera3392-
dc.identifier.SubFormID50051-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryGreen (AAM)en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Das_Comparative_Study_Exploring.pdfPre-Published version1.96 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

91
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

76
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.