Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/110819
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Chinese and Bilingual Studies-
dc.creatorLiu, Xen_US
dc.creatorXiao, Wen_US
dc.creatorLiu, Ken_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-04T07:11:27Z-
dc.date.available2025-02-04T07:11:27Z-
dc.identifier.issn2949-6861en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/110819-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Co.en_US
dc.rightsAvailable under the CC BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). © John Benjamins Publishing Companyen_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Liu, X., Xiao, W., & Liu, K. (2024). Analyzing research trends in localization. Digital Translation, 11(2), 91-115 is available at https://doi.org/10.1075/dt.23009.liu.en_US
dc.subjectLiterature reviewen_US
dc.subjectLocalizationen_US
dc.subjectMethodologyen_US
dc.subjectNew translation practicesen_US
dc.subjectTranslation studiesen_US
dc.titleAnalyzing research trends in localization : a comparative systematic review of journal articles in English and Chinese (2012–2023)en_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage91en_US
dc.identifier.epage115en_US
dc.identifier.volume11en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1075/dt.23009.liuen_US
dcterms.abstractThis literature review paper examines articles on localization in translation studies published in English and Chinese journals from 2012 to 2023. We systematically reviewed a total of 147 publications consisting of 104 and 43 articles in English and Chinese respectively, integrating thematic analysis to examine their research types, areas, and methodologies. The findings reveal notable disparities between the English and Chinese journal papers regarding overall trends across these three dimensions. English papers are often characterized by preference for qualitative approaches and growing interest in multi-methods and mixed-methods designs, highlighting an increasing appreciation for unique elements in localized products. Chinese papers tend to be more general and place greater emphasis on localization training. Despite these variations, there has been a notable convergence towards descriptive approaches in recent studies regardless of the linguistic contexts, perhaps as a response to the evolving needs of the discipline as a whole. Our paper concludes by suggesting future directions for localization research, particularly in response to the dynamic landscape of game localization practices and the application of empirical methods.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationDigital translation, 2024, v. 11, no. 2, p. 91-115en_US
dcterms.isPartOfDigital translationen_US
dcterms.issued2024-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85216113308-
dc.identifier.eissn2949-6845en_US
dc.description.validate202502 bcch-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Others-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingText2022 National Social Science Foundation in China; 2021 National Social Science Foundation in Chinaen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
dt.23009.liu.pdf347.06 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

30
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

19
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.